- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
mamey111
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3 |
| Registered on: | 8/26/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Professional non-compete clauses
Posted by mamey111 on 1/4/24 at 8:04 am to Duckhammer_77
Choice of forum clauses in non-competes are not valid or enforceable in Louisiana, just letting you know in case it is important in your situation. In order for it to be valid, you have to consent to Delaware jurisdiction AFTER you have left and started working for the competitor or when your former employer tries to enforce after you no longer work there. If it lists all the parishes though, then its likely enforceable, but they would have to enforce it here in Louisiana, not Delaware.
la 23:921
2) The provisions of every employment contract or agreement, or provisions thereof, by which any foreign or domestic employer or any other person or entity includes a choice of forum clause or choice of law clause in an employee's contract of employment or collective bargaining agreement, or attempts to enforce either a choice of forum clause or choice of law clause in any civil or administrative action involving an employee, shall be null and void except where the choice of forum clause or choice of law clause is expressly, knowingly, and voluntarily agreed to and ratified by the employee after the occurrence of the incident which is the subject of the civil or administrative action.
la 23:921
2) The provisions of every employment contract or agreement, or provisions thereof, by which any foreign or domestic employer or any other person or entity includes a choice of forum clause or choice of law clause in an employee's contract of employment or collective bargaining agreement, or attempts to enforce either a choice of forum clause or choice of law clause in any civil or administrative action involving an employee, shall be null and void except where the choice of forum clause or choice of law clause is expressly, knowingly, and voluntarily agreed to and ratified by the employee after the occurrence of the incident which is the subject of the civil or administrative action.
I have not trusted most of Kiran's reporting for a few months now, although I know most people in BR think she is golden so I am in the minority on that one. I started doubting her based on the Allie Rice case because it seemed much of her reporting was all over the place. This time around it is pretty apparent that information in her video special was incorrect including regarding the missing prostitute, as police spoke with her so she is clearly not missing. It also appears that police have been investigating this matter in the background the entire time. It takes weeks to subpoena and obtain cell phone evidence, which they did do and spoke to numerous witnesses, and they located the suspect and arrested him. It is also apparent Nathan's wife was not being completely forthright with Nathan's issues and projecting to the media that Baton Rouge and its police dept. are a menace to society and somehow it is Baton Rouge's fault for her husband's unfortunate demise, (although I can understand that she is likely in denial because the truth would be difficult to face for any wife/mother). I personally feel that Kiran has been feeding into his wife's narrative in her reporting on this matter because it fits into her own personal agenda against the police as it is well known that there is a personal conflict between the dept. and Kiran. I would just rather be given information that is unbiased and gets to the truth, instead of what is being thrown out there in order to fit into a certain narrative based on a reporter's personal agenda. Putting out incorrect and/or biased information only creates more confusion and chaos. Facebook detectives are now all over posting about "what happened to the missing prostitute" and "nathan thought he was being followed and that thought he may get mugged". I am definitely aware that BR has its issues and that BR police has its issues, but this is NOT one of those issues. I am no regular advocate for the police, but The only mistake BRPD made was making a statement that "no foul play" is suspected because many people in BR do not have the intelligence to know that they are meaning that there is no evidence that he was in fact murdered.
It could be that when they say the witness does not exist, they do not mean that in literal terms but mean that there was nobody there. I am thinking they somehow know that there was no car on the other side of the tracks and hence “no witness exists” but do not want to say how they know for some reason and calling it “misinformation” which turned into a shite show because nobody trusts them in general.
His story also has numerous holes. He says he saw her pull up and they were both sitting on opposite sides, then the two guys walked by his car through the stopped train cars and not even 10 mins later he hears gunfire, sees her car reverse back and then just stopped with no doors open on it……but at the same time he didnt know it was being shot at? and he decided if that car was leaving maybe he should too. How would the car be leaving if it was stopped at the same time in the middle of gunfire and how would you not see all of the bullet holes in the window if you can also see the doors to know they were closed. Also how can you see her entire car like that through stopped train cars? And you hear that kind of gunfire and you just back up and leave and not think to call the police until the next morning after seeing the news ? The audio recording also …you can clearly hear the train moving and the clank of the cars stopping almost immediately before gunshots….but he says they were stopped at the tracks for no more than 10 minutes before shots were fired? He also told Allie’s dad that it was only one minute later before hearing shots based on his interview (but told kiran 10 mins which is a big difference).
Witnesses give false information sometimes, for whatever reason it can it happen, its the reason we were looking for a white guy with a white truck when it was really derek todd lee, a black guy in a maroon truck.
is a ring camera on the front of a business on that side of the tracks and that could be how they know….amazon will give the footage of ring cameras without owner permission or a warrant, so this could also be the camera that the business owner is also saying “nobody has contacted us” …. Because they technically do not have to contact them to get it. I hope there is a witness but I also know that For whatever reason, people do sometimes try to interject themselves into investigations whether its for attention , to feel important, impress friends, so I just have a lot of doubts and suspicions
His story also has numerous holes. He says he saw her pull up and they were both sitting on opposite sides, then the two guys walked by his car through the stopped train cars and not even 10 mins later he hears gunfire, sees her car reverse back and then just stopped with no doors open on it……but at the same time he didnt know it was being shot at? and he decided if that car was leaving maybe he should too. How would the car be leaving if it was stopped at the same time in the middle of gunfire and how would you not see all of the bullet holes in the window if you can also see the doors to know they were closed. Also how can you see her entire car like that through stopped train cars? And you hear that kind of gunfire and you just back up and leave and not think to call the police until the next morning after seeing the news ? The audio recording also …you can clearly hear the train moving and the clank of the cars stopping almost immediately before gunshots….but he says they were stopped at the tracks for no more than 10 minutes before shots were fired? He also told Allie’s dad that it was only one minute later before hearing shots based on his interview (but told kiran 10 mins which is a big difference).
Witnesses give false information sometimes, for whatever reason it can it happen, its the reason we were looking for a white guy with a white truck when it was really derek todd lee, a black guy in a maroon truck.
is a ring camera on the front of a business on that side of the tracks and that could be how they know….amazon will give the footage of ring cameras without owner permission or a warrant, so this could also be the camera that the business owner is also saying “nobody has contacted us” …. Because they technically do not have to contact them to get it. I hope there is a witness but I also know that For whatever reason, people do sometimes try to interject themselves into investigations whether its for attention , to feel important, impress friends, so I just have a lot of doubts and suspicions
Popular
0











