Tigerfinch

COMPLETELY and utterly ridiculous. Spread offenses and RPO offenses LITERALLY grew from FCS ranks and smaller schools in order to negate the OVERWHELMING talent deficit they faced. Small schools knew they couldn’t line up smash mouth with the big boys so they used spread scheme and multi sets to counter their lack of physicality. These offenses have been around FOREVER...you’re just noticing FB because the big boys have adapted now themselves. I remember Hal mumme running multiple sets in Kentucky LING LONG ago when his understudy was a guy they call mike leach. THIS IS NOT NEW...this IS what FCS and smaller schools have turned to for quite some time. Don’t be silly...call it by whatever name you want but the AIR RAID and such schemes have been around for decades. Yes more teams are mixing it with RPO schemes now as a sort of hybri d air raid/option but don’t be so foolish.

LOL recruits have been lining up like it’s opening night for years for Saban to Chew them out. This is football...they want to win and they want to reach the next level. Give them that and they don’t care.

?? UH...UH...?? pelini coached the LSU defense whilst he was the HC at Nebraska? ??

The question was...what has he won...the answer is a NATTY

Exactly. If people dislike pelini for other reason I’ll accept that...but the being “away” is a POOR excuse. They run spread and RPO concepts in the big 12 B1G and also FCS.

All things are relative. Of course it’ll be a huge jump in talent on opposing offenses, but he will also have a huge jump in talent at his disposal

He’s also been making over a million a year from Nebraska. For a while in order to hire him you’d have to surpass his Youngstown state salary by well over a million to give him a raise.

THANK YOU ?????

Agreed. If the new DC is more comfortable with a 4-3 that’s ok but really not for next year. We have a few guys who can play 4-3 but they would need a solid recruiting class to fill out the roster for a full transition. IMO I’m ok with either 3-4 or 4-3 depending on personnel. They can both work but only with the proper players for each. ?????

Glad I’m not the only one who realizes that. It was my understanding the dude was a LB and then LB coach/DC ??

Meh...all things are relative sir. Aranda is a great DC but I don’t think he’s irreplaceable by any means.

The men you mentioned played a completely different game sir, ESPECIALLY COMPARED TO THIS YEAR.

1. More SEC teams have turned to spread offenses which increase offensive plays and possessions.

2. LSU itself has gone to a wildly successful spread thus creating more time on the field for LSU’s defense via the fact that we scored in mere minutes most of the time.

The aforementioned men played with a ball control offense that milked the clock like a herd of cows this creating less offensive opportunities for a FRESH defense.

Like I said...all things are relative. I think aranda is replaceable even in an atmosphere where there are A LOT more offensive coaches than defensive coaches worth their salt. But you sir, are silly.