- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
PrezCock
| Favorite team: | South Carolina |
| Location: | Florida |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 940 |
| Registered on: | 9/15/2019 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Teen supplements & creatine use
Posted by PrezCock on 5/21/26 at 6:50 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
it is worth noting just how bad the gummies actually are in quality
I wholeheartedly agree with you, and that is why these discussions are important.
re: Teen supplements & creatine use
Posted by PrezCock on 5/21/26 at 6:11 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
I completely understand your point. And what I'm about to say isn't meant to be argumentative. But creatine works by saturation, which takes time. So getting inconsistent creatine intake with gummies isn't terrible. If a bag of creatine gummies has 100 grams of creatine in it, the inconsistency is going to be with each individual gummy, not the aggregate which is what really matters. I'm not saying it's the best route, and if you look at my entire comment that you quoted you would see that I prefer, and suggested, a powdered form of creatine monohydrate.
This is what you just wrote;
This is what I wrote in my first comment;
What's the difference? Please explain how I'm "kind of missing the point though"?
This is what you just wrote;
quote:
When you can just take the powder straight, there isn’t much of a point to going the gummy route, it is just wasting money.
This is what I wrote in my first comment;
quote:
Nothing wrong with Creatine Gummies, but I think they are a waste of money. Creatine Monohydrate powder is good. Creapure is preferred.
What's the difference? Please explain how I'm "kind of missing the point though"?
quote:
Except for not having actual creatine in them.
I completely understand that some are garbage, but some do have creatine in them.
quote:
When's the best time to take it? Pre-workout hydration?
There really is no best time. Creatine works by saturating your muscles cells with creatine. This provides your phospho-creatine energy system access to more energy. Saturation usually takes a week or so. This is why a bunch of the time you will see a "loading" phase with creatine. "Loading" isn't really needed, it just brings that saturation phase down a few days.
One caveat, I believe people with diabetes need to time their creatine intake, but I'm not 100% sure on that.
Creatine is one of the most researched supplements in the world. It is absolutely safe. Give him 5-10grams a day. The biggest issues people face with creatine supplementation is GI issues. But it'll be more like indigestion/diarrhea. Most likely he won't have those issues.
Food is going to be the biggest thing you can do for him. Make sure he gets enough protein. 1 gram per pound of bodyweight he wants to be/play at. Food you eat/chew gets better absorption than food you drink (protein shakes).
After practice/strength training he will be depleted of glycogen. If you are giving him a protein shake after make sure there is some kind of carbohydrate added to it or given to him on the side. I usually add a couple teaspoons of honey to my shakes.
Nothing wrong with Creatine Gummies, but I think they are a waste of money. Creatine Monohydrate powder is good. Creapure is preferred.
Hope this helps
Food is going to be the biggest thing you can do for him. Make sure he gets enough protein. 1 gram per pound of bodyweight he wants to be/play at. Food you eat/chew gets better absorption than food you drink (protein shakes).
After practice/strength training he will be depleted of glycogen. If you are giving him a protein shake after make sure there is some kind of carbohydrate added to it or given to him on the side. I usually add a couple teaspoons of honey to my shakes.
Nothing wrong with Creatine Gummies, but I think they are a waste of money. Creatine Monohydrate powder is good. Creapure is preferred.
Hope this helps
quote:
Do you take it continuously or do you take it in a cycle?
I know this question wasn't directed to me, but I can answer it for you. So HGH works best the longer that you are on it. But one of the problems with elevated HGH is insulin sensitivity. It should be cycled. The cycle depends on the person. Most normal people, something like 5 or 6 months on and 1 month off should be enough to counteract any insulin sensitivity issues. If you have a somewhat higher fasting blood glucose level than normal but not in danger or type 2 diabetes, then you should cycle more often, 4 months on 1 off, or something like that. Also, monitor your blood sugar if you feel like you may be on the cusp of a higher fasting blood glucose level.
quote:
I get mine local at a shop here in South LA. They don’t ship to my knowledge
Thanks for the reply. The search continues lol
re: A closely guarded plan to cool Earth is revealed
Posted by PrezCock on 5/15/26 at 4:16 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
I thought aerosols were bad for the ozone layer?
It was the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that were in the aerosols that were bad for the ozone layer. I think they stopped putting CFCs into aerosols in the 80's.
Yeah, I like the stuff as well. I'm 47 and it is definitely effective. Where do you get yours from? I used to get mine from Peptide Sciences but they are not in the market anymore. I tried some other place but it was garbage. Still looking for a reputable company. Especially one that I don't have to worry about customs.
I'll break it down for you because you are getting a lot of misinformation, from all boards.
MK-677 is a growth hormone secretagogue, not a SARM. What it does is it tells the body to produce more HGH. It does this by acting as ghrelin (a hormone that makes you hungry). Unlike SARMs and other "Steroids" it does not stop the body from making Testosterone or HGH. So there is really no need for a post cycle therapy to restore the body's natural production after a cycle. The biggest problem is that it increases insulin sensitivity and will need to be cycled. Something like 5 months on and 1 month on is enough to counteract those effects.
MK-677 has been widely tested and used in multiple populations. It has been shown to increase muscle mass in the elderly population without changing any other factors. It is also prescribed to children who may have growth hormone insufficiency to help them grow.
Would I let your kid take it? That's not my call, and it really shouldn't be his, he's too young to really educate himself on these things. My suggestion is that you or your doctor do the research for him. There may be some good reasons for him to take it. The main reason for me would be if he was undersized for his age. At his age he is still growing and his growth plates haven't cemented in, meaning if he was on the shorter side it can help him get a little taller.
These are just the facts. As others have said, his body is producing the best mix to grow naturally at his age.
If you want links to scientific studies just let me know.
I hope this helps.
ETA: Links to some studies
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10272984/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4205082/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5632578/
MK-677 is a growth hormone secretagogue, not a SARM. What it does is it tells the body to produce more HGH. It does this by acting as ghrelin (a hormone that makes you hungry). Unlike SARMs and other "Steroids" it does not stop the body from making Testosterone or HGH. So there is really no need for a post cycle therapy to restore the body's natural production after a cycle. The biggest problem is that it increases insulin sensitivity and will need to be cycled. Something like 5 months on and 1 month on is enough to counteract those effects.
MK-677 has been widely tested and used in multiple populations. It has been shown to increase muscle mass in the elderly population without changing any other factors. It is also prescribed to children who may have growth hormone insufficiency to help them grow.
Would I let your kid take it? That's not my call, and it really shouldn't be his, he's too young to really educate himself on these things. My suggestion is that you or your doctor do the research for him. There may be some good reasons for him to take it. The main reason for me would be if he was undersized for his age. At his age he is still growing and his growth plates haven't cemented in, meaning if he was on the shorter side it can help him get a little taller.
These are just the facts. As others have said, his body is producing the best mix to grow naturally at his age.
If you want links to scientific studies just let me know.
I hope this helps.
ETA: Links to some studies
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10272984/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4205082/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5632578/
re: Strained Lower Back Muscles - Peptides To Speed Up Healing?
Posted by PrezCock on 5/7/26 at 11:54 am to Arkapigdiesel
Someone suggested Reverse Hypers and got a couple of downvotes. I just want to expand on that topic a little bit.
Reverse Hypers are a fantastic exercise to rehab a lumbar strain. It isn't a good exercise to start out with. Lumbar strains are an absolute pain. I would suggest you start doing simple exercises like supermans, planks, and static holds against gravity that engage those lumbar muscles. When those become easy and don't cause you pain anymore start doing exercises like hyperextensions and unsupported rows. Again, start light and increase in intensity when that pain goes away. When that pain is gone, then start on those Reverse Hypers. RH is a fantastic exercise, but it should be used mid/late rehab and is excellent for maintaining a healthy low back.
Hope this helps
ETA: And of course, this is on top of any other exercises/stretching that can help, i.e. stretching hamstrings, hipflexors, etc...
Reverse Hypers are a fantastic exercise to rehab a lumbar strain. It isn't a good exercise to start out with. Lumbar strains are an absolute pain. I would suggest you start doing simple exercises like supermans, planks, and static holds against gravity that engage those lumbar muscles. When those become easy and don't cause you pain anymore start doing exercises like hyperextensions and unsupported rows. Again, start light and increase in intensity when that pain goes away. When that pain is gone, then start on those Reverse Hypers. RH is a fantastic exercise, but it should be used mid/late rehab and is excellent for maintaining a healthy low back.
Hope this helps
ETA: And of course, this is on top of any other exercises/stretching that can help, i.e. stretching hamstrings, hipflexors, etc...
re: Knee Replacement Update/Question
Posted by PrezCock on 5/6/26 at 4:34 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
This is not remotely true, and terrible advice.
I'm a PT. And having 0 extension and 90 flexion is the goal for day 3 after surgery.
Maybe what you went through was different from the normal. But what you responded to my statement is false. The goal for immediate post surgical TKA range of motion by the end of day 3 is 0 extension (which is full extension) and 90 flexion. Now, those numbers don't always happen, but be assured, that is the goal for every patient.
re: Knee Replacement Update/Question
Posted by PrezCock on 5/6/26 at 11:52 am to Old Man and a Porch
quote:
My out patient PT started 12 days after surgery. My in home started 2 days after surgery.
That's much better than the 12 days without. But by day 3 you should have been at 0 extension and 90 flexion. Even starting 2 days post surgery is still doing you a disservice. TKA is a terrible, terrible recovery as you well know. It should have started ASAP after surgery to give you the best outcome. Sorry that your are going through this. Do the MUA (manipulation under anesthesia), I'm sure it'll suck but it'll put you back on the right track.
Good luck
re: If Holly wasn't a hostage, John would've escaped Nakatomi and left the other hostages
Posted by PrezCock on 5/6/26 at 11:08 am to magildachunks
quote:
He's only heroic because he isn't allowed to be selfish.
I don't think you understand what heroes are made of. Real heroes aren't patrolling the streets looking to accomplish "heroic deeds". Real heroes are put into positions by happenstance where they are forced to either act or die (or let others get killed). I'm not a hero myself, but I've served with plenty of them. And the biggest difference between them and myself is that they were put in an extraordinary position where they weren't allowed to be selfish. 99% of "heroes" are only heroic because they aren't allowed to be selfish.
re: Knee Replacement Update/Question
Posted by PrezCock on 5/6/26 at 7:22 am to Old Man and a Porch
What Lsukinesalum2001 is spot on. I want to add a bit to it though. You started PT 12 days after your surgery. This is insane. As Lsukinesalum2001 said, you should have started immediately. Same day or day after. Most TKA you're going to want 0 extension and 90 flexion by day 3 post surgery. Not starting PT 12 days after. Unless you got an infection, someone screwed up. If you are having problems with ROM, get the manipulation under anesthesia.
quote:
It is right in the middle. Deep inside.
Deep Middle could be Piriformis Syndrome. Try some piriformis stretches to see if it relieves your symptoms.
This seated chair stretch is the one I have people do the most:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR1rtQ-PF38
I'll have them hinge forward at the hips to a stretch and immediately come out of the stretch (This is called a dynamic stretch). I'll have them do this 4 or 5 times. Follow up with the same movement but hold the stretch for 30-60 seconds. I have them repeat the whole process 3 times.
If that seems to work then I suggest you incorporate some clamshell exercises to strengthen the muscle.
I hope this helps.
re: Creatine-wow
Posted by PrezCock on 4/24/26 at 2:47 pm to Big Scrub TX
If you haven't used creatine before than I would say you probably would have noticed multiple benefits. If you are training properly you should have noticed increased strength gains over that time. Especially being able to eek out 1 or 2 more reps that you previously couldn't. Creatine is a significant part of your Phosphocreatine system which helps the anaerobic function in your muscles. For lack of better example, say a person fails on a particular rep because they have used up all of their anaerobic energy. So say that person failed on rep 5. Supplementing with creatine will give those muscle cells longer access to energy. Suddenly those 5 reps turn into 6 or 7. Not because you're stronger, but because your muscles have that extra energy. Over time, added time under tension, you should increase muscular strength and hypertrophy (with proper programming). This is on top of the "bloating" of the muscles that some people report. Creatine supplementation does increase the amount of intracellular water but that is due to osmosis.
Other benefits include cognitive functions such as clarity and less brain fog. I'm not an expert on those benefits but I superficially know them.
Other benefits include cognitive functions such as clarity and less brain fog. I'm not an expert on those benefits but I superficially know them.
re: Creatine-wow
Posted by PrezCock on 4/24/26 at 1:30 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
I put 5 in my food or protein shake every day. What am I supposed to be noticing after 18 months of doing so?
Are you asking me this, or are you just adding to the thread? What 5 do you put in your food or protein shake everyday? Grams of Creatine or Gummies? I can answer your question if you want me to.
Just to piggy back a little on what DrDenim said.
Your Dr could also have looked at your Creatine Kinase (CK). CK levels increase in the blood due to muscle damage. When I say muscle damage it can be anything from a heart attack to muscle soreness caused by training hard and anything in between. Your "intense workouts" no doubt contributed to higher CK levels. Which, most likely wouldn't be a big deal. Now if you trained excessively hard, you can increase your CK and other metabolites to a point where your kidneys can't filter them out properly and it'll put you into kidney failure called Rhabdomyolysis. You and your Dr would know if you were in Rhabdo. Best guess, your workouts caused elevated CK levels due to muscle soreness.
Hope this helps.
Your Dr could also have looked at your Creatine Kinase (CK). CK levels increase in the blood due to muscle damage. When I say muscle damage it can be anything from a heart attack to muscle soreness caused by training hard and anything in between. Your "intense workouts" no doubt contributed to higher CK levels. Which, most likely wouldn't be a big deal. Now if you trained excessively hard, you can increase your CK and other metabolites to a point where your kidneys can't filter them out properly and it'll put you into kidney failure called Rhabdomyolysis. You and your Dr would know if you were in Rhabdo. Best guess, your workouts caused elevated CK levels due to muscle soreness.
Hope this helps.
re: How often do you retest your max lifts?
Posted by PrezCock on 4/17/26 at 8:01 am to MarkInTable
quote:
How often do you retest your max lifts?
I'm a little different than most because I'm a conjugate method guy. Max Effort lifts are a part of my training. I train them once or twice a week. They range from 5rm to 1rm and they are staggered with my lifting. Max effort lifting is good for strength gains but it's also great for tendon strength.
The body needs stress to grow. There are two basic laws, Wolff's Law (bones) and Davis's Law (soft tissue). There's nothing wrong with max effort lifting as long as it's part of a consistent routine and you listen to your body. Consistent max effort lifting will increase tendon and ligament strength, if used with good form and listening to your body.
re: Smartest guy Joe Biden knows flees US because he refuses to pay debts.
Posted by PrezCock on 4/16/26 at 11:52 am to CleverUserName
Not specifically to you OP
Remember that scene in A Bronx Tale, where C is going after a kid that he loaned $20 to and keeps running away and not paying his debt back? Then Sonny stops C and asks him what he's doing. C tells him and Sonny says, (paraphrasing here) "Do you like him? Then why keep going after him? You paid him $20 and now you'll never have to deal with him for the rest of your life. You got off cheap." That's how I feel about this. He owes some scumbag lawyers $17million and instead of paying up he runs to S. Africa. Good riddance, he can stay there. We got off cheap.
Remember that scene in A Bronx Tale, where C is going after a kid that he loaned $20 to and keeps running away and not paying his debt back? Then Sonny stops C and asks him what he's doing. C tells him and Sonny says, (paraphrasing here) "Do you like him? Then why keep going after him? You paid him $20 and now you'll never have to deal with him for the rest of your life. You got off cheap." That's how I feel about this. He owes some scumbag lawyers $17million and instead of paying up he runs to S. Africa. Good riddance, he can stay there. We got off cheap.
Popular
0












