- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Other than the interception
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:20 pm to arrakis
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:20 pm to arrakis
quote:
So subtle it was invisible. You should learn what constitutes a BIB
Block in the Back
ARTICLE 4. a. A block in the back is contact against an opponent occurring
when the force of the initial contact is from behind and above the waist
There ya go.
1
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:21 pm to hg
quote:
Other than the interception
hell the fricking forward progress on the third play of the game was bull shite. should have been a first down.
Agreed. Jefferson advanced the ball half a yard beyond the stick and the side judge was looking right at him, yet marked the ball where the Bama defender eventually pushed him back and tackled him.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:21 pm to BAMADWIGHT
You are sorry you asked! 
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:21 pm to Funky Tide 8
Sore losers? If it had been a clean game but, it wasn't! Not into sore fricking cheaters, Funky tide!
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:22 pm to back9Tiger
quote:
bullshite on the first possesion, he stopped one yard past the first down marker then got hit backwards, That was a first down. The helmet to the chest was a no call. the interception. admit it gumps the sec is fricking you in the arse to get to the MNC. I root for no SEC team from hear on out. agenda, agenda, agenda.
Even if all the calls you're talking about were wrong, it doesn't mean shite. It happens in every fricking game. It's always the losers crying about it.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:22 pm to BamainCFL
quote:
it was roughing, it was running into.
roughing is 15, running into is 5, which he did.
there's no way that's questionable.
+1
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:26 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
ARTICLE 4. a. A block in the back is contact against an opponent occurring
when the force of the initial contact is from behind and above the waist
..and the "block" in the video isn't even close. Anyone who thinks that is a BIB is either ignorant or on drugs or both.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:28 pm to arrakis
quote:
..and the "block" in the video isn't even close. Anyone who thinks that is a BIB is either ignorant or on drugs or both.
Did he not put both hands in his back and push?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:33 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Did he not put both hands in his back and push?
NO...he ran past 77 so fast it looked like an "Ole" in a bullfight. Get a fricking clue...
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:36 pm to arrakis
quote:
NO...he ran past 77 so fast it looked like an "Ole" in a bullfight. Get a fricking clue...
So now you are arguing the brevity of his block in the back?
Again I ask, did he not put both hands in his back and push?
I will say, it wasn't severe enough that I would expect it to be called, however, it had a huge impact on th play.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:43 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So now you are arguing the brevity of his block in the back?
NO
quote:
Again I ask, did he not put both hands in his back and push?
NO
quote:
I will say, it wasn't severe enough that I would expect it to be called, however, it had a huge impact on th play.
Like I said, you are either totally ignorant or on drugs or both. No doubt about it.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:56 pm to arrakis
quote:
NO
Ok.
quote:
NO
Video shows otherwise as far as I can see, but ok.
quote:
Like I said, you are either totally ignorant or on drugs or both. No doubt about it.
Well, I'm not on drugs, so what specific piece of knowledge am I ignorant of?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:59 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Well, I'm not on drugs, so what specific piece of knowledge am I ignorant of?
While you are mildly entertaining, I'm not wasting bandwidth with a clueless Tard. Do yourself and the game a favor, don't take up officiating....you'll be laughed off the field
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:02 pm to arrakis
quote:
While you are mildly entertaining, I'm not wasting bandwidth with a clueless Tard. Do yourself and the game a favor, don't take up officiating....you'll be laughed off the field
I doubt I could do worst.
And I already admitted it wasn't severe enough to be called, although it did have a material impact on the play.
There are much more egregious things to complain about.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News