- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Yes, The DSA Is a Communist Organization
Posted on 7/3/26 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 7/3/26 at 1:15 pm
Yes, The DSA Is a Communist Organization
There was a time, back when I was young and virile, and the girls flocked to be seen with me, when the DSA went to great lengths to distinguish themselves from and even keep out the communists.
Their vision was more akin to implementing 1970s Nordic social democracy, with a mixed economy, a generous-to-a-fault welfare state, and strict limits on income inequality. It was a very flawed vision, but it was distinguishable from communism.
"The DSA’s posture toward terrorism, which ranged from equivocation to outright support, drove away many of the organization’s remaining advocates of liberal democracy.
Two dozen prominent old-line members announced their resignation the next month, conceding that “today’s DSA has driven itself beyond redemption” and had become 'entirely wanting in its dedication to the moral principles that are the foundation of democratic socialism.'"
That time is long past, just as my Lothario days are.
The term "Democratic Socialism" is now just a marketing term used by many DSA-aligned candidates and especially their media promoters who are determined to deny that today's "socialists" have anything in common with communists, despite their openly Marxist chants, approving quotes of Lenin and Mao, and the fact that the most prominent members of the DSA openly say that they are communists
LINK.
There was a time, back when I was young and virile, and the girls flocked to be seen with me, when the DSA went to great lengths to distinguish themselves from and even keep out the communists.
Their vision was more akin to implementing 1970s Nordic social democracy, with a mixed economy, a generous-to-a-fault welfare state, and strict limits on income inequality. It was a very flawed vision, but it was distinguishable from communism.
"The DSA’s posture toward terrorism, which ranged from equivocation to outright support, drove away many of the organization’s remaining advocates of liberal democracy.
Two dozen prominent old-line members announced their resignation the next month, conceding that “today’s DSA has driven itself beyond redemption” and had become 'entirely wanting in its dedication to the moral principles that are the foundation of democratic socialism.'"
That time is long past, just as my Lothario days are.
The term "Democratic Socialism" is now just a marketing term used by many DSA-aligned candidates and especially their media promoters who are determined to deny that today's "socialists" have anything in common with communists, despite their openly Marxist chants, approving quotes of Lenin and Mao, and the fact that the most prominent members of the DSA openly say that they are communists
LINK.
Posted on 7/3/26 at 1:26 pm to djmed
From Hot Air link
quote:
It reminds me of Politifact's insistence that Zohran Mamdani isn't a communist because he didn't use the word on his website.
Sure, he SAYS he wants to seize the means of production, but calling him a communist is false!
The thing is, no matter how many times the Pravda Media says that the DSA Democrats aren't communists, the DSA communists keep saying that they are, in fact, communists, and their platform is every bit as radical as their critics say so.
Popular
Back to top
1





