- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/4/25 at 3:57 pm to djmed
Massie should get on that but he won’t. Hes too busy hoping Trump is on some list while in his 13th year of Congress just like Rand advocates for term limits and he has 14 years.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 4:09 pm to RT1941
quote:
Do you feel the same about military enlistment?
I've never understood why this is always the knee-jerk response.
quote:
if you're old enough to defend this country, you deserve the right to vote for your Commander in Chief.
I don't believe that. If you're old enough to carry a gun and be trained on how to effectively kill people with it, and young enough to do what strangers tell you to do without questioning, you are old, and young, enough to defend this country.
We don't elect our officers.
The People don't vote on whether or not to go to war, people who are too old to defend their country under arms are the ones who vote for war.
Our founders set up the country such that a young man could be conscripted before he was old enough to vote. If it was good enough for them, it's good enough for me.
There's a reason there's an upper age limit for conscription, and a lower age limit to qualify to be able to vote for or against war - and they don't overlap.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 4:10 pm to djmed
I agree, but the only way we're going to get that is through a convention of the states.
Popular
Back to top

0





