View in: Desktop
Copyright @2023 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
quote:
in this case classified documents. Simply being in possession of them is against the law.
No it's not, have you ever been a courier?
Keep showing how stupid and petulant you are...
The authority on classified docs can declass whatever and hold whatever.
Only read-in programs have further security issues, but guess what, he's the authority on those as well.
To withdraw POTUS on classification takes it away from elected control and puts it into bureaucratic control beyond the people.
quote:
No it's not, have you ever been a courier? Keep showing how stupid and petulant you are... The authority on classified docs can declass whatever and hold whatever. Only read-in programs have further security issues, but guess what, he's the authority on those as well. To withdraw POTUS on classification takes it away from elected control and puts it into bureaucratic control beyond the people.
Then he can make the argument in court that he declassified them while still President and provide proof or witnesses to that fact. If he can’t, that defense won’t hold up.
This is the problem he has though. For him to argue they are declassified, he’s going to have to testify to that fact. Do you think his attorneys are chomping at the bit to put him on the stand and subject to cross examination?
Even if he does testify to that fact, if he has no evidence, witnesses, paper trail, or anything backing him up, then it’s hard to see a jury buying it. He has to have proof. Let’s see if he does.
quote:
Even if he does testify to that fact, if he has no evidence, witnesses, paper trail, or anything backing him up, then it’s hard to see a jury buying it. He has to have proof. Let’s see if he does.
OK groomer!

quote:
You do realize this doesn’t exonerate Trump
You do realize they've spent 40+ million and more than 6 years and have found nothing.
You do also realize that black Jesus had personal documents from his Presidency stored illegally as well.
This is bull shite and will go nowhere. Same people that broke in and ransacked his place were fbi agents under investigation from Durham.
They were not the same fbi he met with on previous occasions who gave him the lack to put on the door.
If you can't see a complete hit job then you have you head in the sand.
Nothing will convince you.
quote:
Yeah, well, he can throw temper tantrums all he wants on Truth Social, but it does not change the fact that he is unelectable and will hopefully be locked up to keep him from getting the nomination.
What the frick? You want to send him off to the gulag, comrade? Eat shite. They need to take your sorry arse there instead.
re: Trump is truthing about Jack SmithPosted by TenWheelsForJesus on 11/27/22 at 7:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
All he cares about is people lying about him.
The people lying about him have the power of the state and the media behind them. That's kind of an important aspect.
Popular
Back to top
