- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The term DEW prompted me to ask Grok about other IC propaganda terms.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:37 pm
Here is a summary of Grok's reponse:
In addition to directed energy weapon here are some additional propaganda terms from our esteemed IC:
National Security
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Collateral Damage
Freedom and Democracy
Hybrid Warfare
Extremism" or "Radicalization
Threat Environment
Information Operations
Global Leadership
ETA: if I ran for office I would repeat the following phrase or some manifestation of it to sound important and bamboozle the media:
"In a bold display of global leadership, our enhanced interrogation techniques uncovered a hybrid warfare plot in the threat environment, ensuring national security with minimal collateral damage. Rest assured, our information operations will promote freedom and democracy while neutralizing those pesky weapons of mass destruction."
quote:
The intelligence community and government officials often use language that is deliberately vague or flexible to maintain operational secrecy, control narratives, or influence public opinion.
In addition to directed energy weapon here are some additional propaganda terms from our esteemed IC:
National Security
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Collateral Damage
Freedom and Democracy
Hybrid Warfare
Extremism" or "Radicalization
Threat Environment
Information Operations
Global Leadership
quote:
Why These Terms Are Effective for Propaganda?
These terms share characteristics that make them useful for shaping narratives:
Vagueness: They are broad enough to apply to multiple contexts, allowing flexibility in interpretation.
Emotional Appeal: Terms like "freedom" or "WMDs" evoke strong emotions, rallying support or fear.
Plausible Deniability: Ambiguity allows officials to avoid committing to specifics, reducing accountability.
Technical or Euphemistic Language: Terms like "enhanced interrogation" or "collateral damage" sanitize controversial actions, making them more palatable.
quote:
Conclusion
The term "directed energy weapon" exemplifies how vague language can serve strategic purposes, from maintaining secrecy to shaping perceptions. Other terms like "national security," "WMDs," or "collateral damage" function similarly, allowing officials to influence narratives while avoiding scrutiny. By recognizing these patterns, individuals can better critically assess government communications and seek clarity behind the jargon.
ETA: if I ran for office I would repeat the following phrase or some manifestation of it to sound important and bamboozle the media:
"In a bold display of global leadership, our enhanced interrogation techniques uncovered a hybrid warfare plot in the threat environment, ensuring national security with minimal collateral damage. Rest assured, our information operations will promote freedom and democracy while neutralizing those pesky weapons of mass destruction."
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 12:48 pm
Popular
Back to top
