- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Big takes from Lindell's CS today. The top being nobody proved the data false
Posted on 8/10/21 at 9:59 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 8/10/21 at 9:59 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Is your Trump card (hehe) going to be that Mike presents IP addresses on his spreadsheet that ping to China?
actually it was hexidecimal that came out rich text...
but no one there could explain what the data was supposed to be.
This post was edited on 8/10/21 at 10:01 pm
1
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:00 pm to GodnCountry
And just as you copied and pasted that text from some other document, could Mike not do the same?
So wouldn’t the source of Mike’s data be incredibly important to proving his allegations it was hacked in real-time?
So wouldn’t the source of Mike’s data be incredibly important to proving his allegations it was hacked in real-time?
This post was edited on 8/10/21 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:04 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
but no one there could explain what the data was supposed to be.
That's not true. What is true is they would only tell them a limited amount of details as the rest will come out.
They have the source IP and the target MAC addresses.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:07 pm to GodnCountry
quote:
They have the source IP and the target MAC addresses.
Right, but from where?
And if they had it real-time in November 2020, why not present it right after the election for the court of public opinion and the respective stage legislatures? And the Supreme Court and the Electoral College, etc.?
Why wait 10 months to present it when your guy is out of office with no power?
I know the response will be to change the election laws in the states, but presentation of this “irrefutable” evidence then would have done the same and you would have had a plausible argument for keeping Trump in power to push the issue.
It just doesn’t make sense.
This post was edited on 8/10/21 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:09 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
So wouldn’t the source of Mike’s data be incredibly important to proving his allegations it was hacked in real-time?
He was told... PEr the guy you are talking about:
quote:
it was retrieved with custom tools on the China side of things, as they targeted election systems via the Internet, not collected on the side of the election systems.
Next question.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:12 pm to GodnCountry
quote:
Next question.
And so Mike tells us that, presents an .rtf file of IPs pinging to China, and that is supposed to warrant wholesale reversal of the election?l via the Supreme Court unanimously [doing something]?
Nothing about the actual tools used or why he sat on it for 10 months?
I know I just play a lawyer on the internet, but even I can see massive evidentiary issues on getting any of that into a court of law.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:12 pm to GodnCountry
Lindell better explain the data sets tomorrow. If he doesn’t, he is going to seriously damage his reputation. Not a leftist. Check my post history to know that I am 100% convinced this is stolen.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:14 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
And so Mike tells us that, presents an .rtf file of IPs pinging to China, and that is supposed to warrant wholesale reversal of the election?l via the Supreme Court unanimously [doing something]?
Nothing about the actual tools used or why he sat on it for 10 months?
I know I just play a lawyer on the internet, but even I can see massive evidentiary issues on getting any of that into a court of law.
Nobody sat on anything for 10 months. Just because you were not listening while dismissing does not mean nobody talked about it nor tried to do anything about.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:16 pm to GodnCountry
I’m familiar with the lawsuits and the lawyers and the Kracken and all of that.
Mike was at the WH after the election.
But why was the info never presented in one of Sidney or Rudy’s lawsuits?
Mike was at the WH after the election.
But why was the info never presented in one of Sidney or Rudy’s lawsuits?
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:33 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Motherfricker you STILL believe the Russian collusion bull shite from 2016
You just body slammed Low T Boy
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News