Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Nebraska considering making it's electoral votes a "winner takes all" slate.

Posted on 6/28/24 at 1:01 pm
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51726 posts
Posted on 6/28/24 at 1:01 pm
This is actually very huge! Trump has sizable polling leads in Nevada, North Carolina, Arizona, and Georgia. (btw, Florida and Ohio are now red states). If he wins these and all of Nebraska, without winning Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, then the election would be 269 to 269.

In that event, it goes to the GOP-led house, to which they'd vote for Trump there (assuming there's no GOP congressmen willing to fall on their sword for Biden).

However, if Nebraska is not winner take all, then the 2nd District (Omaha) could vote for Biden, and with the above scenario, where Trump loses Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, while winning Nevada, North Carolina, Arizona, and Georgia, it would give Biden the win at 270 to 268.

This is an example of a hidden, little news story that has a possible major impact on the election.

The Register Citizen - *a Hearst newspaper
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33585 posts
Posted on 6/28/24 at 1:04 pm to
I say they pass it but just for this election year.

It would be a great to the Democrats.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram