- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie prohibiting involvement
Posted on 6/17/25 at 7:51 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
Posted on 6/17/25 at 7:51 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:Except for the War Powers Resolution (1973) where Congress, for a large part, extended that to the executive.
The Executive Branch doesn't have the power to send us to war; that's the responsibility of Congress. It's in the Constitution.
Once again, Congress is their own worst enemy. And if it means them holding or gaining more power (and thus money) as individuals... ours.
I'm all for them taking the power back. But one has to ask after all the crisis, why is imperative where we are not actively participating in a war other than money (Congress again) anywhere.
Not Vietnam (for which it was passed). Not Panama, Grenada, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran (80's), Beruit, etc.
And it requires the executive confer with Congress. Johnson just canceled his trip to Israel and Trump just returned early from the G7 to do that consultation. So what's Massie's beef? Oh, I think I deduced it.
Popular
Back to top

0




