- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:39 pm to TigersHuskers
Because he is versed in Cyrillic languages.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:49 pm to TigersHuskers
mine aint any gooder , but, I had a stroke and a damaged brain
and run circles around him
and run circles around him
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:50 pm to OWLFAN86
The clown s groking up another one thread.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 10:08 pm to Jbird
Sad
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 6/19/25 at 4:27 pm to troyt37
The no fly zone was to keep the Iraq regime from bombing, strafing and dropping poison gas on the Kurds. The Kurds by the way were committing war against the regime. In effect the no fly zone was helping the Kurds attack the Hussein regime. Even an airhead should be able to see that would be unacceptable to Saddam. Beyond that why wouldn't Iraq have every right to fire missiles at our planes flying over his country?
Legality
Neither the No-Fly Zones nor enforcing them with aerial bombing were authorised by the United Nations.[8] The Secretary-General of the United Nations at the time the resolution was passed, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, called the no-fly zones "illegal" in a later interview with John Pilger.[9][10]
The American, British and French governments justified the no-fly zones by invoking United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, though the resolution made no explicit reference to no-fly zones.[8]
Legality
Neither the No-Fly Zones nor enforcing them with aerial bombing were authorised by the United Nations.[8] The Secretary-General of the United Nations at the time the resolution was passed, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, called the no-fly zones "illegal" in a later interview with John Pilger.[9][10]
The American, British and French governments justified the no-fly zones by invoking United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, though the resolution made no explicit reference to no-fly zones.[8]
This post was edited on 6/19/25 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 6/19/25 at 4:28 pm to Jbird
Unstickied? 
The end of the world lasted a week
The end of the world lasted a week
Posted on 6/19/25 at 4:30 pm to SDVTiger
Bwhaha
Page 46 of 46
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News