Dan Smoot Expalins In 1966, The Attempt To Subvert Our American Ideas We See Happening N

The crisis we face today against those who wish to destroy the foundational principles that have made our nation great is nothing new.
The video is 1:34 long which far bypasses many folks attention spans, but nevertheless is still important.

quote:

---

In this 1966 broadcast, conservative activist Dan Smoot argues that the United States was founded as a constitutional republic, specifically designed to protect individual liberty, rather than as a democracy, which he characterizes as a system of unchecked majority rule that inevitably leads to dictatorship and the erosion of freedom (0:00-1:20).

Core Arguments
Defining Democracy vs. Republic: Smoot defines a "democracy" as a system where the majority has absolute power to dictate laws, which he claims risks becoming "revengeful, bloody and cruel" (6:31-6:50). In contrast, he describes a "constitutional republic" as a system where rulers are limited by a written constitution, ensuring that government power remains constrained regardless of the will of the majority (1:20-1:35).
Subversion of Language: He contends that referring to the U.S. as a "democracy" is a deliberate tactic by "totalitarians" to obscure the original American principles and gradually subvert the Republic into an equalitarian system (0:34-0:52, 1:43-2:00).
Constitutional Intent: Smoot cites Founding Fathers such as James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Adams, arguing that they were deeply wary of the "follies and fury of democracy" and established the Constitution specifically to bind government officials and safeguard against tyranny (5:45-8:15).
Critique of Contemporary Trends: He strongly criticizes mid-20th-century shifts, particularly citing Gunnar Myrdal's An American Dilemma and the 1954 Supreme Court school segregation decision, claiming these represented a move away from Constitutional constraints toward an "equalitarian democracy" (2:35-4:16).

Conclusion
Smoot concludes by urging his audience to educate others on these principles, suggesting that the only way to "keep" the Republic is to recognize its unique structure and resist the push toward government-guaranteed equality at the expense of individual liberty (9:20-10:56).

---