- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Censorship of information question
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:42 pm to bfniii
Posted on 1/26/21 at 9:42 pm to bfniii
quote:
that big tech censoring certain political views is unfettered capitalism. how naive can a person be to believe that.
i have been saying for some time now that conservatives need to tone down the complaining about social media and create their own platforms. however, i don't want conservatives to go play in their own sandbox. libs need to hear what the msm isn't telling them. if conservatives bolt, that will largely disappear. that's why this site is so critical. despite what phags are saying, admins are VERY lenient and allow libs to get away with egregious phaggery. too much imo but, it helps to keep people around so they can hear the truth about the election
There’s a lot to unpack here.
But I guess the question boils down to why do you think Chicken should be forced to host viewpoints or opinions he finds objectionable and those that he would not like his website associated with?
Private property rights and free market principles of supply and demand used to be hallmarks of conservatism. Why has that been abandoned so suddenly?
Posted on 1/27/21 at 7:39 pm to Iphone
quote:ok comrade
Seems like a good policy
quote:who are these "people" and precisely how are they being hurt by freedom of information?
People are tired of hearing and reading
quote:prove there wasn't election fraud
dumb, delusional, stupid shite like this board propagated for years
quote:you think it stops with the press corps? get a clue
No reason to have lunatics with WH credentials
Posted on 1/27/21 at 7:40 pm to Chromdome35
quote:this always cracks me up.
you might get more people to respond if you didn't act like such an entitled arse
1. morons post moronic crap
2. i point out moronic crap
3. it's somehow my fault
why don't you try addressing the CAUSE not the EFFECT
quote:you sound really soft and emotionally weak. if these people don't like being called out for their stupid crap, then stop posting stupid crap. how about that?
You seriously come across like you are entitled to an answer to your questions
Posted on 1/27/21 at 7:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:let me clarify. i don't think the platform owner should be forced to do anything. i said that they should be free to host as they see fit. however, i don't want individual conservatives to just wall themselves off. they need to be out fighting the good fight.
why do you think Chicken should be forced to host viewpoints or opinions he finds objectionable and those that he would not like his website associated with?
Posted on 2/4/21 at 11:15 am to bfniii
just a reminder that dem shills are running around here demagoguing for corrupt bureaucrats who are actively trying to limit their free and open access to information
unbelievable
unbelievable
Popular
Back to top
