Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Capitol “incursion” question for board defense attorneys or prosecutors

Posted on 1/15/21 at 11:12 am
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 1/15/21 at 11:12 am
If a person was permitted in a side door by Capitol Police, and did nothing criminal once inside, how can they be charged with a crime? By “doing nothing inside,” I mean no disruption, no trespassing, no obstruction of officers, etc. Wouldn’t the invitation into the building by police followed by an arrest be entrapment?
This post was edited on 1/15/21 at 11:13 am
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15420 posts
Posted on 1/15/21 at 11:18 am to
I’m not a criminal atty but most of these ppl have been essentially charged with being in a restricted area. My understanding is that it’s essentially the same as trespassing (although I could be wrong).

My gut reaction is that trespassing requires the entry to be into an area you don’t have permission to be. But I’m thinking they would have to raise the issue of permission by way of an affirmative defense. Meaning they would have the burden of proof.

From reading the thread of the nearly illiterate Sullivan - I couldn’t tell if he was saying the cops left them in bc the cops were sympathetic to Trump or BLM.

Plus-definitely he people who got into the building itself (not the restricted perimeter but the actual building) - forced their way in by breaking windows and climbing thru. And that’s definitely illegal. And would be dangerous NOT to prosecute. You can’t let ppl get away with that kind of shite. You have to enforce laws or they become unenforceable.

Ex. Those ppl violating election laws probably believed they were justified bc OMB is such a meanie pants and they were helping the country. Helping the country is a noble intent. It’s the intent to violate the law that matters - not whether your feelings were motivated by something positive.

The Trumpers who went in thru broken windows-were participants in a riot. Even tho they were motivated by something which you may see as good; they were still intentionally violating criminal trespass statutes.
This post was edited on 1/15/21 at 11:23 am
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 1/15/21 at 11:22 am to
quote:

lus-definitely some of the people who got in there - forced their way in by breaking windows or climbing thru. And that’s definitely illegal.


Yeah no doubt about that, and as I said, I was mainly referring to anyone who went in via police invite/welcome, and just stood around with their finger up their butt and did nothing wrong.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19535 posts
Posted on 1/15/21 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Plus-definitely he people who got into the building itself (not the restricted perimeter but the actual building) - forced their way in by breaking windows and climbing thru. And that’s definitely illegal. And would be dangerous NOT to prosecute. You can’t let ppl get away with that kind of shite. You have to enforce laws or they become unenforceable.


I agree, but there is that matter of a bizarre double standard of FBI action and inaction.

Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27158 posts
Posted on 1/15/21 at 11:31 am to
quote:

bizarre double standard


Come on man, that was a community bonfire that got out of control...
Posted by Epaminondas
The Boot
Member since Jul 2020
4181 posts
Posted on 1/15/21 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

If a person was permitted in a side door by Capitol Police, and did nothing criminal once inside, how can they be charged with a crime?
People are charged with crimes because that's part of the show. Every time they arrest some guy that was taking selfies in the Capitol, it's breaking news like they just tracked down the Unabomber.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram