- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A scary thought about democratic vote harvesting
Posted on 9/16/20 at 6:26 pm to SCLibertarian
Posted on 9/16/20 at 6:26 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
Eli Goldfinger's thread
Dear Lord SCLibertarian
quote:
The constant fearmongering about ballot harvesting in all 50 states is tiring.
You must have missed the part about Dems pushing no signature authorization, anyone (not just immediate family) can vote for you, and mass mailings to every address on the voter roles even if they know the person no longer lives there. Dems are 100% calling their shot. Don't be a moron.
Posted on 9/16/20 at 6:28 pm to Dr Brisket
i believe the only vote harvesting was done in north carolina and done by the republicans.
Posted on 9/16/20 at 6:54 pm to WorkinDawg
This is the most informative thread about the topic that's been posted here.
Eli's Thread with Voting Methods by State
Eli's Thread with Voting Methods by State
Posted on 9/16/20 at 7:00 pm to SCLibertarian
With all due respect, holding up Eli Goldfinger as the arbiter of truth is a fools errand.
He's 1/2 as smart and 1/3 as clever as he thinks he is. I've seen him twist truth, argue against irrefutable facts, and outright lie more times than I can count. I won't read his wall of nonsense and he's earned that position.
He's 1/2 as smart and 1/3 as clever as he thinks he is. I've seen him twist truth, argue against irrefutable facts, and outright lie more times than I can count. I won't read his wall of nonsense and he's earned that position.
Posted on 9/16/20 at 10:57 pm to RICHIE APRILE
The number is 67, not 60. That's assuming all 100 Senators vote. Actual rule is 2/3 of voting members I believe so absences or non-voters could change actual number. However, if all are present and vote it would require 67 guilty votes to remove from office.
Posted on 9/17/20 at 6:30 am to ArkBengal
RGB is everything to them
Trump replacing her would be an aids crusted dildo through their hearts
Trump replacing her would be an aids crusted dildo through their hearts
Back to top

1





