Started By
Message

re: 4.1% gdp

Posted on 7/27/18 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27341 posts
Posted on 7/27/18 at 1:40 pm to
So was it Bush or Obama who was responsible for the economy? Bc the y'all didn't take credit for it until the millisecond it looked like it was stabilized. Before that it was all Bush's fault.

You can't have it both ways to suit your case.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17026 posts
Posted on 7/27/18 at 1:40 pm to
My point is and was that obama never managed to get the gdp above 3%. Which is atrocious. Obama himself said that this type of abysmal growth was the new normal. Obama had good quarters and bad quarters. But overall he was an absolute failure.
Can we address the fact that without government intervention we have an environment in which “livable” wages are now becoming a reality? Why is this? Can you please teach me how this has happened without government intervention?
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17026 posts
Posted on 7/27/18 at 1:42 pm to
Obama’s economy during his entire presidency was abysmal because of bush. Now that trump is in office the economy’s stratospheric growth is due to Obama’s hope and Change.
How? No one knows. But it’s facts!
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27341 posts
Posted on 7/27/18 at 1:45 pm to
By their logic then, Clinton's economic growth should be credited to Reagan and H.W., and Bush's economic troubles should be attributed to Clinton.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17026 posts
Posted on 7/27/18 at 1:49 pm to
Clinton had success due to the dot com phenomenon. He too was a joke
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram