- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
17-21, 225 yards and 2 TD's
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:33 am
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:33 am
I would say we had excellent play out of both QB's tonight.
2
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:35 am to steelreign
Yes both looked almost identical tonight
Considering 1 is a 5th year senior and the other has a just weeks in the system though it says something
Considering 1 is a 5th year senior and the other has a just weeks in the system though it says something
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:36 am to jacks40
quote:
Considering 1 is a 5th year senior and the other has a just weeks in the system though it says something
Which system?
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:36 am to jacks40
quote:
Considering 1 is a 5th year senior and the other has a just weeks in the system though it says something
No it doesn't
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:37 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Which system?
The system that is lsu's offense under les miles
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:39 am to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
Considering 1 is a 5th year senior and the other has a just weeks in the system though it says something
No it doesn't
It really does
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:46 am to jacks40
quote:
It really does
No it doesn't
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:51 am to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
No it doesn't
explain y a 5th year QB looking no different than a redshirt sophpmore guy who just joined the teama few months ago doesnt look bad on the older guy when comparing the 2
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:54 am to steelreign
Not to mention the final score was 49-3.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:56 am to jacks40
quote:
explain y a 5th year QB looking no different than a redshirt sophpmore guy who just joined the teama few months ago doesnt look bad on the older guy when comparing the 2
Mett came in against a completely depleted NW State defense. They were hammered in the first half. Then 3 or 4 out of 8 completions came off of bubble screens.
People buying into Mett after that game is silly.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:58 am to jacks40
look. When I go to a game I'm a freak, watch every play with the binoculars. Saw Brockers INT tonight, it was a INCREDIBLE catch. Don't know if a replay caught it or not. Besides the point but I sat row 6 section 401, corner where visitor comes out
I watch every play with the binoculars, great view in those seats. Jarrett Lee is the starter. I think he should continue to start. But watching both players, Mettenberger has more ability. By far. Not close.
As I said, JL should remain starter for THIS team. And I am as excited as hell about this year's team, but the future at QB, even if for ONE year, is eye-popping.
I watch every play with the binoculars, great view in those seats. Jarrett Lee is the starter. I think he should continue to start. But watching both players, Mettenberger has more ability. By far. Not close.
As I said, JL should remain starter for THIS team. And I am as excited as hell about this year's team, but the future at QB, even if for ONE year, is eye-popping.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:59 am to LSUSOBEAST1
17-21,225 & 2 tds is excellent.
Negative comments are from idiots.
Negative comments are from idiots.
Posted on 9/11/11 at 1:59 am to jeffsdad
quote:
Negative comments are from idiots.
I said nothing negative
Posted on 9/11/11 at 2:00 am to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
Mett came in against a completely depleted NW State defense
it was Northwestern, whenever he came in it was against a "depleted" defense. He also started after tbe 1st half when NW had a long break and plenty of time to rest.
quote:
Then 3 or 4 out of 8 completions came off of bubble screens.
and lee didnt have the same advantage and throw a few WR screen/bubble passes himself?
quote:
People buying into Mett after that game is silly.
no more than people disregarding 3 years of Lee to buy into this 1 game of Lee
This post was edited on 9/11/11 at 2:01 am
Posted on 9/11/11 at 2:02 am to jeffsdad
quote:
Negative comments are from idiots.
I dont view the statement "mett is a better QB than Lee" as negative.
just factual
Posted on 9/11/11 at 2:03 am to jacks40
I didn't say anything of Lee. Just the fact that Mett came in and played well against NW State doesn't "say something."
Posted on 9/11/11 at 2:04 am to jacks40
quote:
just factual
Posted on 9/11/11 at 2:06 am to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
I didn't say anything of Lee. Just the fact that Mett came in and played well against NW State doesn't "say something."
when comparing the 2 against the same team, and both had basically the same offensive players surrounding them it does say something
In college football I will expect the older guy to play better and if he the play is roughly the same I will expect the younger guy with less expereience to have more talent and upside than the 5th year starter
Posted on 9/11/11 at 2:08 am to jacks40
quote:
when comparing the 2 against the same team, and both had basically the same offensive players surrounding them it does say something
In college football I will expect the older guy to play better and if he the play is roughly the same I will expect the younger guy with less expereience to have more talent and upside than the 5th year starter
I can't take ya'll serious anymore. Goodnight
Posted on 9/11/11 at 2:08 am to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
LSUSOBEAST1
disagree if you will but saying 1 LSU QB is better than another is certainly not negative
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News