- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Proper steps to take for getting a fish mounted?
Posted on 8/16/14 at 12:10 am to Boats n Hose
Posted on 8/16/14 at 12:10 am to Boats n Hose
I'll post up a picture of my buddy's replica largemouth tomorrow.
Eta:
Eta:
This post was edited on 8/16/14 at 12:15 am
Posted on 8/16/14 at 8:31 am to GeauxTime9
I have a 44 or 45" redfish mount (I forget now). All I did was I take multiple pictures and measurements. I don't know if it is considered a good mount or not but you can tell it is a replica. It is about 5 years old now.
Posted on 8/16/14 at 9:18 am to Boats n Hose
quote:
I prefer skin mounts. Most replicas I've seen look like replicas.
Not tryin to split hairs here, but some taxidermists, me included, do not consider a replica to be true taxidermy. Replicas are an art form, like painting and sculpting. There is no "taxidermy" involved. The term "taxidermy" itself loosely translated means "move the skin". There is no skin to be moved in a replica. I prefer the actual skin mount. It is the skin of the fish I actually caught and not a substitute. However, I can also see the merits of having a replica for protected and endangered species. Plus, unless you're a big time baller, you are gonna lay out BIG bucks for an actual skin mount of a bill fish, for instance. And replicas ain't cheap, either!
Popular
Back to top


0





