Started By
Message

re: Proper steps to take for getting a fish mounted?

Posted on 8/16/14 at 12:10 am to
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
40486 posts
Posted on 8/16/14 at 12:10 am to
I'll post up a picture of my buddy's replica largemouth tomorrow.

Eta:
This post was edited on 8/16/14 at 12:15 am
Posted by SeaPickle
Thibodaux
Member since May 2011
3183 posts
Posted on 8/16/14 at 8:31 am to
I have a 44 or 45" redfish mount (I forget now). All I did was I take multiple pictures and measurements. I don't know if it is considered a good mount or not but you can tell it is a replica. It is about 5 years old now.

Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
8771 posts
Posted on 8/16/14 at 9:18 am to
quote:

I prefer skin mounts. Most replicas I've seen look like replicas.


Not tryin to split hairs here, but some taxidermists, me included, do not consider a replica to be true taxidermy. Replicas are an art form, like painting and sculpting. There is no "taxidermy" involved. The term "taxidermy" itself loosely translated means "move the skin". There is no skin to be moved in a replica. I prefer the actual skin mount. It is the skin of the fish I actually caught and not a substitute. However, I can also see the merits of having a replica for protected and endangered species. Plus, unless you're a big time baller, you are gonna lay out BIG bucks for an actual skin mount of a bill fish, for instance. And replicas ain't cheap, either!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram