Started By
Message

re: Why hasn't a moratorium been placed on coal mines!

Posted on 6/8/10 at 9:09 am to
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49516 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Who said that the BOP was out of service?





ETA:
This post was edited on 6/8/10 at 9:13 am
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27678 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 9:11 am to
hat roll with me on this one. I am trying to play along. I would like for him to answer the questions.
Posted by LSU80 USF08
Orlando, FL
Member since Nov 2007
2729 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 9:28 am to
quote:

company ignoring safety concerns.


Which company?

quote:
it started with the MORONIC idea to use and out of service BOP that they service themselves when they are the ones wanting to save money!!!


Who said that the BOP was out of service?
Who serviced the BOP?
Who was trying to save money?


TF, you are way behind the curve on this.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49516 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 9:32 am to
quote:

TF, you are way behind the curve on this.
how so?
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27678 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 9:51 am to
I would like for the poster to answer the questions. The post is not clear. Would you care to explain how I am behind the curve?
Posted by JWS3
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
2502 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 10:06 am to
quote:

THink about that for a second, your only concern is saving money on the bottom line because you are rewarded for it and YOU SERVICE YOUR OWN BOP's!!!!


The bottom line is the only reason any business exists. Airlines maintain there own planes, or pay contractors to do it, which are usually chosen based on cost. Don't see the maintenance of BOPs being any different.
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27678 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:43 pm to
So do you care to answer the questions?
Posted by oilfieldtiger
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Dec 2003
2904 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

excess food? Com'on I know some of the MMS people. They arrive and an hr later or so another helicopter arrives with an ice chest of fresh gulf shrimp.

i have never observed this, nor have i been asked for anything from an mms inspector. i've always provided them w/ lunch on location, along w/ their pilot, as a matter of courtesy.
Posted by lashinala
End of 565
Member since Jan 2006
5750 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 7:59 pm to
In a way, there is a moratorium....but a lot weaker.
The ash from coal has traditionally been stored in 'ponds' next to water (why?). So, recently there was a flood in Tennessee and a lot of ash...with heavy metals, concentrated arsenic, etc. (imagine what is in coal ash) washed downstream into the Tennessee river basin. Now TVA has decided to quit storing ash next to water...ingenious idea!
Animals? Plenty were affected, but bioaccumulation will take time to measure. Look how long it took us to quit using DDT.
Coal mining accidents usually don't cause environmental chaos...at least that we can see. Unfortunately a lot of people in north Alabama have wells for drinking water, and over the next 20 years they may have problems. It's just a slow motion version of the gulf. Water is a great dispersant.
After 911, marshalls didn't 'fix' planes, people having the knowledge that a terrorist will probably kill everyone onboard 'fixed' planes. The same knowledge can be applied to deep water rigs now. The rig is the danger...now we all know the threat it poses. We took that for granted before. Suggested listening:
The Who--Why did I fall for that?
Posted by Tigerguyinexile
Member since Oct 2009
470 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 8:18 pm to
This is Apples vs. Oranges. Sure, people died in both but the spill has caused environmental and economic damage that cannot be measured; gulf is turned into a cesspool and it will be years before things go back to "normal" (i.e. pre-spill). Coal Mine had nothing close to this.
Posted by lashinala
End of 565
Member since Jan 2006
5750 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 8:25 pm to
We used to take the tops off of mountains to get to the coal underneath. It was close....everything dead on top and horrible erosion killing all the fresh water stuff downstream. Before that we did the same thing with trees...18th century version of oil. We keep getting fooled.
Posted by Tigerguyinexile
Member since Oct 2009
470 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 8:32 pm to
That was then, this is now.
Posted by Tigerguyinexile
Member since Oct 2009
470 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 8:34 pm to
Yes, and regulations and laws were passed to stop what the mining companies did with respect to environmental damage. Should oil companies be favored?
Posted by LSU80 USF08
Orlando, FL
Member since Nov 2007
2729 posts
Posted on 6/8/10 at 9:02 pm to
Some people can only see in black and white. 'We must drill because we are addicted to oil' / 'We must stop drilling now, it is killing our planet'. The gray answer is to invest sufficient research in fixing problems that we are certain to see at whatever stage our drilling technology has progressed to.

If the oil industry were a car, we need to make sure the brakes work better than the accelerator.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram