- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nearly 25,000 fast food workers in California have lost their jobs past year.
Posted on 4/13/25 at 11:28 am to Narax
Posted on 4/13/25 at 11:28 am to Narax
quote:
Yea people are expensive.
A $1 Million machine that replaces 6 workers (3 shifts 2 people) might replace $40k in salary per but then $60k in related costs (training, insurance etc...) pays for itself in 3 years (Assuming low maintenance costs over the first 3 years).
And the machine won't get injured on the job and make a workers comp claim for 2M
Neither will the machine show up late or call out enough to force u to have a multi step documentation process before you can fire it
Posted on 4/13/25 at 11:38 am to ct4lsu
quote:
F ck cali. no one saw this coming...
Except for anyone that has ever taken an economics class. Obviously, I know you were being sarcastic and agree with you.
This is literally the second lesson of entry level econ when you learn the laws of supply and demand for labor. My rant is why did it take a study to prove this . . . It's like performing a study to prove addition and subtraction?
This post was edited on 4/13/25 at 11:41 am
Popular
Back to top

0




