- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Graph that shows outbreak was highest in places that said they weren’t wearing masks
Posted on 8/11/20 at 1:58 pm to tigerskin
Posted on 8/11/20 at 1:58 pm to tigerskin
quote:
He is saying people did it without having an official government mandate
Wrong again.
quote:
If the mask mandate had a greater role in controlling the spread, then we would've expected to see a steeper increase in cases and deaths in Jefferson Parish than in Orleans Parish.
But the current data does not corroborate that theory, at least not in Louisiana.
Linkie
1
Posted on 8/11/20 at 1:59 pm to Hobnailboot
What part of “mandate” don’t you understand?
Posted on 8/11/20 at 2:04 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Graph that shows outbreak was highest in places that said they weren’t wearing masks
What part of “mandate” don’t you understand?
Dude the entire thread is basically him saying he thinks we've reached limited herd immunity. Maybe the masks helped that, maybe they didn't but they weren't the main cause of the slowdown. I thought yall libs were basically saying NOBODY WEARING DA MASK so you could get a LaToya mandate. And Chinese dude who's smart basically says what we've all known the entire time: cloth mask dont stop no covid. Let's ask Sweden.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 2:09 pm to Hobnailboot
First time in my life I have been called a lib.
Unbelievable how both sides just want any data to fit their narrative. Bizarre as hell.
I will summarize and you can do whatever you want with it.
Having about 20 percent infected plus social distancing and masks is going to tank this (that is population immunity). Why this combination pisses so many people off makes no sense.
Unbelievable how both sides just want any data to fit their narrative. Bizarre as hell.
I will summarize and you can do whatever you want with it.
Having about 20 percent infected plus social distancing and masks is going to tank this (that is population immunity). Why this combination pisses so many people off makes no sense.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 2:14 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Having about 20 percent infected plus social distancing and masks is going to tank this (that is population immunity).
Which one of those three things is important in your opinion my dude?
Posted on 8/11/20 at 2:16 pm to Hobnailboot
All of them. If we get rid of social distancing and masks right now the 20 percent won’t be enough. Read Gu’s thread again.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 2:23 pm to tigerskin
He said he estimates 20% of Orleans had it on May 1. And he clearly thinks the level of infections is much more important than mask etc. Bro you're just pimping your mask position. Go yell at some neck in the aisle at Wal-Mart.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 2:24 pm to Hobnailboot
“Caveat #3: The effects of immunity are likely strongly conditioned on the current level of social distancing and behavior.
If society were to "return to normal", then the effects of such immunity would be significantly reduced as the rate of transmission increases.”
If society were to "return to normal", then the effects of such immunity would be significantly reduced as the rate of transmission increases.”
Posted on 8/11/20 at 2:25 pm to Hobnailboot
You just don’t have the want/ability to pay attention to the entire picture he is presenting. I can’t help you with that.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News