Started By
Message

re: Changes coming to Louisiana Metro Statistical Areas

Posted on 3/16/24 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
11222 posts
Posted on 3/16/24 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Geographically speaking Baton Rouge should have grown north because the terrain is better. Because of socioeconomics that's not what happened.

Dallas is similar. The terrain south of downtown has hills and bluffs, but the wrong demographics. All the growth has been in the opposite direction.

However, demographic and socioeconomic conditions aren’t the only reasons growth happens in certain directions. It’s easier for developers to build neighborhoods on flat terrain. Tract housing is almost never developed in scenic geographical areas
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48560 posts
Posted on 3/16/24 at 2:38 pm to
North of BR is pretty flat too until you get up near Clinton or St Francisville.

I grew up in a northern suburb, and the problem is that you are closest to the shitty areas of BR.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32489 posts
Posted on 3/16/24 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Lafayette may indeed show some improved data by losing Iberia Parish, although it will cost them an overall population decline (Iberia Parish has @70,000 people). They'd go from a five-parish area to a four-parish area (Lafayette, St. Martin, Acadia, Vermilion).

Still the third largest MSA in the state, unless there were large population changes since 2020, should still have 20k more than the Shreveport MSA.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram