- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/24/14 at 12:52 pm to The Third Leg
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/24/14 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 5/24/14 at 12:55 pm to Traffic Circle
frickin' right, frick yeah!
Maybe put a Micheal Sam Statue up there, he has far more cultural significance on Baton Rouge than Coca Cola.
SEC-SEC-SEC
Maybe put a Micheal Sam Statue up there, he has far more cultural significance on Baton Rouge than Coca Cola.
SEC-SEC-SEC
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:02 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Does anyone take exception with the fact that Delgados only connection to downtown is that he owns a private business there? He is a Councilman for the Southdown's area. Yet he is going to propose legislation, in effect use his position as a city official, to attempt to resolve this matter in a way he sees fit. Screw the legal system and any chance for the parties to reach an agreement.
Because I see this as a huge issue. Delgado needs to go.
Yes. Delgado is an uberdouche. He blasted papa johns pizza on his Facebook last week because they wouldn't take his check.....
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:04 pm to Sprocket46
Capitalism, free speech, free expression, the powers these afford one can cut both ways.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:21 pm to The Third Leg
Five pages and this much controversy over a sign? 
Wow, we really have our priorities straight, don't we?
Wow, we really have our priorities straight, don't we?
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:22 pm to Paul Allen
They care. It's significant, a cultural landmark.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:24 pm to The Third Leg
It's a sign. It's a company based in Atlanta, GA. It's not like it's a community coffee sign. My goodness people.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:25 pm to Roscoe
what a d-bag move.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:28 pm to Paul Allen
frick. Yes, Paul. The worlds gone mad, like a penis under arousal.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:31 pm to Roscoe
quote:No, it's good bidness.
It's a shame that the new owner of the old richoux's building decided to unplug and cover the repaired coca cola sign on the buildings " grand opening" simply to squeeze some money out of coke.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:33 pm to The Third Leg
Sure wish these people would get this upset over the public school system in BR.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:35 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
Most of these people deal almost exclusively in memes.
The world, it's fricked.
The world, it's fricked.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:36 pm to The Third Leg
hehe
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:37 pm to bradwieser
quote:
Delgado said if the issue isn’t resolved soon, he would propose an ordinance to penalize “anyone who covering a downtown landmark creating an eyesore,” for more than seven days.
SUBMIT OR DIE
Posted on 5/24/14 at 1:42 pm to colorchangintiger
Delgado will eventually become the mayor/president of EBR. The parish deserves an a-hole leader such as him.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 2:11 pm to Roscoe
I haven't been keeping up with all this and don't know the new owners. But from what I've been reading, it looks like the new owner of the building wants Coke to pay him today's market rates for advertising since the sign is attached to his building. He doesn't have to OWN the sign. It's just like a LAMAR billboard. The land owner doesn't OWN the billboard - but, does receive compensation from LAMAR for the billboard being placed on his property. I really think the new owner is 100% within his rights to do so. I'm not defending one side or the other. The way I see it, Coke should step up and pay a monthly rate to advertise from a sign ATTACHED to his property. OR, the Arts Council should just move the sign (as the sign's owner) to another location.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 2:14 pm to Box Geauxrilla
quote:
Technically, if this guy doesn't own the sign, he could legally build some sort of fence surrounding it and they couldn't say shite cause he built it on his property. Then he wouldn't be touching or defacing it, but still effectively hiding it from public display.
I doubt the city would give him the permits for that.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 2:27 pm to bradwieser
quote:Wouldn't he be grandfathered in?
Delgado said if the issue isn’t resolved soon, he would propose an ordinance to penalize “anyone who covering a downtown landmark creating an eyesore,” for more than seven days.
Posted on 5/24/14 at 2:39 pm to Geauxtiga
So hot women who work downtown would have to uncover?
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News