- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Saints' D-Line and Development
Posted on 4/25/22 at 11:09 am
Posted on 4/25/22 at 11:09 am
We Draft D-lineman all day AND early. The problems are:
A. They go through growing pains
B. They can't stay healthy
C. We have a hard time developing them
A. The growing pains are real with the d-linemen we draft. As early as we draft them, they are SUPPOSED to come out Game 1 with their hair on fire. We haven't gotten that type of action in a while since drafting them early; which we always do.
B. Our D-lineman that we draft early can't stay healthy. I know 14-16 games is grueling; but the games you play, we don't see production; so we often worry what is going on when you are NOT on the field; especially when trading a future first round to get you (Davenport).
C. As talented as our D-lineman are in college, every now and then, we see flashes; but nothing consistent. Third down is the money down, no way you shouldn't be pressuring the quarterback more; but looking for your check every Tuesday. Our division is talented, but as many picks we invent into specifically our DE's we don't see production, if not can't staying on the field. You cant ask Cam to keep making plays for what Davenport and Turner should be doing consistently. Is it a coaching issue? It cant be a talent issue with us drafting them so early and being high on the draft boards.
A. They go through growing pains
B. They can't stay healthy
C. We have a hard time developing them
A. The growing pains are real with the d-linemen we draft. As early as we draft them, they are SUPPOSED to come out Game 1 with their hair on fire. We haven't gotten that type of action in a while since drafting them early; which we always do.
B. Our D-lineman that we draft early can't stay healthy. I know 14-16 games is grueling; but the games you play, we don't see production; so we often worry what is going on when you are NOT on the field; especially when trading a future first round to get you (Davenport).
C. As talented as our D-lineman are in college, every now and then, we see flashes; but nothing consistent. Third down is the money down, no way you shouldn't be pressuring the quarterback more; but looking for your check every Tuesday. Our division is talented, but as many picks we invent into specifically our DE's we don't see production, if not can't staying on the field. You cant ask Cam to keep making plays for what Davenport and Turner should be doing consistently. Is it a coaching issue? It cant be a talent issue with us drafting them so early and being high on the draft boards.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 11:20 am to Superboy3209
quote:
C. We have a hard time developing them
This whole thread lost credibility with this nonsense. Ryan Nielson is one of the best developers in the league. He can't control injuries. He has developed onyemata from a raw canadian with like 3 years of football experience into a REALLY good DT. Hes made several UDFA DTs look like solid role players (Roach and Tuttle for example). He has helped make Davenport an absolute force when he is healthy. He also helped Develop Trey Hendrickson into a $60M DE.
Injuries have been the main issue with the DL and it still hasn't been that much of an issue given that the backups perform well enough for us to have a top 5 defense in the league.
Popular
Back to top
