Started By
Message

re: Larry Johnson

Posted on 9/17/08 at 9:51 pm to
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
29855 posts
Posted on 9/17/08 at 9:51 pm to
Ill pass LJ aint that good.
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 9/17/08 at 10:21 pm to
the o-line for KCisn't very good anymore, so we could trade jamaal, but no draft picks, we don't have that many. laryy johnson is very good behind a good line so i don't mind that.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112616 posts
Posted on 9/18/08 at 2:31 am to
Why would we wanna give up Brown for him? I don't get that.

Fiscally, I can't see it being a good idea to have the highest paid running back in the league AND Larry Johnson and Deuce. That is WAY too much money tied up at running back.

Not to mention, other than Bush, every running back we've had back there the last couple of seasons has done well. Deuce has. Stecker and Thomas have done well in limited time.

I don't think we need Larry Johnson at all.

We need Pierre Thomas or Deuce to get more of Reggie's carries. Limit Reggie to about 5-7 carries per game for the sole reason of keeping the D honest so we can throw to reggie 8-10 times per game.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram