- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ingram is merely serviceable
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:21 pm to whodatfan
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:21 pm to whodatfan
quote:living up to the namesake.
You really are pissing me off today. If you haven't noticed, this is a saints board. Not a saints hate board. I think for the most part saints FANS reside here, minus the hacks that come out on game day. If a player is absolute garbage ( Charles grant, Jason David) saints fans won't sit there ignoring the obvious blindly defending. But to come on here and dog this dude because he doesn't have 800 yards at 10ypc, and 8 tds in week 4 is fricking ridiculous and shows you have an agenda. The guy is producing well and getting better every week in a pass heavy offense with a stable of HEALTHY running backs to divide the touches. Ivory was featured alot last season whenever he could actually get on the field. This Ingram thread bashing is just agenda based and really needs to stop (which it won't). You're calling saints fans out on a SAINTS board. Why don't you take a break and go jack Alejandro off somewhere. You have much more success at that than starting threads on saints talk.
0
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:21 pm to whodatfan
quote:
This Ingram thread bashing is just agenda based and really needs to stop
what is the agenda? where is the hate? calling average play average?
some of you are ridiculous.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:21 pm to Morgus
quote:
It's interesting that that data point you've chosen in one that pertains to a team following a 1-15 season as opposed to one two years out from a Super Bowl.
Its Emmits first 4 games as rookie. They went 7-9 that year.
Your not taking consideration we are a pass happy team with a so so run blocking offensive line. We also use 3 RBs.
We've also been playing from behind in the first 3 games. Especially the two shootouts against the Packers and Texans.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:22 pm to Morgus
Ingram is the type of running back in the NFL that gets better the more that you use him. Because he is in a backfield that splits carries between 3 different guys that makes him a role player and it is more difficult for a runner like him to get the impressive numbers as long as his carries stay around the 10-15 area. He is a running back who if he gets 20-25 carries a game he pounds on the defense and gets more effective as the game goes on. I think Ingram plays his role well with this Saints team.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:26 pm to Noplacelikehome
With a healthy Ivory his role is about to get much smaller.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:26 pm to NIH
quote:
what is the agenda? where is the hate? calling average play average? some of you are ridiculous.
Drew was average today. Only one td with 2 picks. Should have gave chase a shot against that vaunted jacksonville defense. You know, just to see if he had the Ivory "wow" factor.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:28 pm to whodatfan
Drew has proven himself over a six year career with us. Ingram doesn't have that luxury as of now. Shitty comparison.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:30 pm to NIH
quote:
Drew has proven himself over a six year career with us. Ingram doesn't have that luxury as of now. Shitty comparison.
And there we have it. Drew got 6 years, Ingram 4 games. Nice.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:30 pm to NIH
quote:
Drew has proven himself over a six year career with us. Ingram doesn't have that luxury as of now. Shitty comparison.
You would think that would be obvious.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:30 pm to NIH
quote:
Drew has proven himself over a six year career with us. Ingram doesn't have that luxury as of now.
that's the point twat waffle
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:31 pm to whodatfan
right. and so far he has been average.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:31 pm to angryslugs
no, it wasn't actually.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:31 pm to Morgus
That you two are judging a player off of his first 4 games in the NFL? Yeah, there's something obvious here.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:32 pm to whodatfan
quote:
And there we have it. Drew got 6 years, Ingram 4 games. Nice.
Yeah contradictory argument is contradictory.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:32 pm to whodatfan
we can't say he's been average so far? what's so wrong with that? no one is saying these four games are it and he's destined for 3-4 yards and a cloud of dust.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:33 pm to whodatfan
quote:
And there we have it. Drew got 6 years, Ingram 4 games.
Positive experience is earned, not assumed. You can not assess beyond what has been shown.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:33 pm to NIH
yes it was. 4 games isn't enough time to judge a player.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:34 pm to angryslugs
quote:
4 games isn't enough time to judge a player
no one is saying he is a finished product.
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:35 pm to whodatfan
quote:
That you two are judging a player off of his first 4 games in the NFL? Yeah, there's something obvious here.
Every team grades all of its players after each of its games. Unless you're a rookie. Coaches refuse to grade rookie performance because "its too early."
Right.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 10/2/11 at 4:38 pm to Morgus
So, cupcake, what exactly are you expecting numbers wise for him on a passing team with Pierre and Sproles commanding touches as well? I really am just interested to know.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News