- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are we done in FA?
Posted on 4/6/18 at 1:19 pm to bonethug0108
Posted on 4/6/18 at 1:19 pm to bonethug0108
So you know exactly what positions Ireland wants to upgrade huh? He explained all this to you when exactly? Who's he looking at at 27, I mean, cause you know what he's thinking
0
Posted on 4/6/18 at 1:25 pm to bonethug0108
Your ridiculous in your insistence you know exactly what Peyton/Ireland/Loomis are thinking.... yeah we ONLY wanted an upgrade at D tackle if it was a past his prime Suh??? That's just dumb, if the right player is there at the right price they will make a move
Posted on 4/6/18 at 1:36 pm to JGWSnextKamara
Yes I know because Payton himself said at the owner's meeting that they have 3 more musts: TE, WR, and pass rusher.
We addressed TE shortly after that with Watson.
He also said they didn't see DT as a need but decided to go after Suh because he's fricking Suh.
We aren't looking to upgrade DT in FA. We may sign one for depth, and if one is BPA in the draft we may take one, but we aren't looking at Hankins and Logan.
The people that keep insisting this are the misguided ones because they misread the Suh situation, which Payton later spelled out.
Sorry but you're wrong.
Edit:
Also wrong about that. Come on.
We addressed TE shortly after that with Watson.
He also said they didn't see DT as a need but decided to go after Suh because he's fricking Suh.
We aren't looking to upgrade DT in FA. We may sign one for depth, and if one is BPA in the draft we may take one, but we aren't looking at Hankins and Logan.
The people that keep insisting this are the misguided ones because they misread the Suh situation, which Payton later spelled out.
Sorry but you're wrong.
Edit:
quote:
Peyton
Also wrong about that. Come on.
This post was edited on 4/6/18 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 4/6/18 at 4:57 pm to bonethug0108
They aren't insisting, you are, they're hoping, like with Meredith, the other part of my post. While your checking my spelling grab a dictionary, bet if the right DT gets cut after June 1st we go after him....and the deal for Fairley was for 4 years so back to the point, they thought they needed help for 4 years but now they've decided it's all good.....maybe they're just only interested in former Detroit Lions at DT, that's probably it
Posted on 4/6/18 at 5:50 pm to JGWSnextKamara
Fairley was a pass rushing DT. Logan and Hankins are more run stuffers. We aren't looking at guys like that because we already have Davison for that (and aren't going to pay $4+ mil for a marginal upgrade).
Suh is a phenomenal pass rushing DT and pretty good against the run. That's why we went after him.
I mean if you don't want to believe what Payton himself said that's fine. Not like I'm making it up like the people thinking we were in for any DT because we went after Suh.
Suh is a phenomenal pass rushing DT and pretty good against the run. That's why we went after him.
I mean if you don't want to believe what Payton himself said that's fine. Not like I'm making it up like the people thinking we were in for any DT because we went after Suh.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News