Started By
Message

So let's talk about The Beatles

Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:46 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64952 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:46 pm
I see where they are called the most influential pop/rock group of all-time and yet I have friends who claim The Beach Boys are far more influential. I do not hold the latter opinion but what are some of the main arguments to prove the former?

Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50248 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:47 pm to
3 pages (major, on a board like this).
Posted by CaptainPanic
18.44311,-64.764021
Member since Sep 2011
25582 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:54 pm to
The Beatles were the most popular band of all time.


Beach Boys>Beatles tho :fact:
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141660 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:55 pm to
played at parties

listened to on ski trips

somebody link all my classic essays on why the Beatles were more influential than Zep. I don't feel like retyping them.

Beach Boys are great too BTW
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50248 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 9:00 pm to
20 year old American chicks listen to the Beatles on the reg (in my small sample of reference of course). No Beach Boys.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141660 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

20 year old American chicks listen to the Beatles on the reg (in my small sample of reference of course)
quote:

No Beach Boys
you should play some for 'em
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
20855 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

The Beatles were the most popular band of all time.


I was old enough to remember Beatle Mania- no young person today will ever understand. The Beatles changed EVERYTHING. A lot of singers were no longer relevant because the Beatles pushed them out of the charts. I went to see Help! at the show- girls screamed the entire time through the film! But they were not just some teen idols- they changed along with their audience, stayed in the forefront of music. The Beatles had kids picking up a guitar everyone wanted to be a Beatle. Sgt. Pepper? Talk about shaking up the rock world!
I laugh when people talk about 'Queen' or 'Michael Jackson' being the ultimate superstars...that is a joke! There was the Beatles & Elvis- nothing else will ever come close in the last 60 years of music and how it affected our culture. Bob Dylan too, but more so just in the rock world. Again, younger kids will never know what it was like- I feel sorry for them. You Tube and Pandora may expose a lot of groups, but there was nothing like just buying an album. Shame that radio today is just rap/hip-hop crap, RnB pop crap, watered down alternative crap and same old, same old, commercialized so-called classic rock, which is certainly not classic in my book & I grew up in the 60's onward. But to get back on track, the Beatles were always on the radio & on the charts. Hell, my 93 year old dad grew up in the Big Band era, yet he still loves the Beatles and appreciates their song writing abilities. Here in Houston, we even had a station playing nothing but Beatles music in the early 80's- remember, this was decades before XM radio. Only the Beatles could have pulled that off.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59442 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 9:28 pm to
AM 920 KBTL

LINK
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141660 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 9:36 pm to
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32841 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 9:41 pm to
Musically far ahead of their time. The Lennon McCartney songwriting machine helped as well.

Posted by Fontainebleau Dr.
Mid-View New Orleans
Member since Dec 2012
2400 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 11:11 pm to
The Beatles started out playing poppy, bubble-gum rock and roll. About three years later, they recorded "Eleanor Rigby." And that's all one really needs to know about the greatness of the Beatles. The Beach Boys, as good as they were, never had an "Eleanor Rigby."
Posted by Sayre
Felixville
Member since Nov 2011
5503 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

and yet I have friends who claim The Beach Boys are far more influential


You have some dumb friends.
Posted by Sayre
Felixville
Member since Nov 2011
5503 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

the Beatles were more influential than Zep.


Anybody that would argue against that is dumb too.

Led Zeppelin is great too BTW.
Beach Boys don't suck either. Was grooving some Pet Sounds earlier tonight, by happenstance.
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 11:41 pm
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

20 year old American chicks listen to the Beatles on the reg (in my small sample of reference of course). No B
20 year old American chicks have the best taste in music
Posted by TigerRanter
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
6703 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 7:49 am to
quote:

and yet I have friends who claim The Beach Boys are far more influential
I love both bands, but to say the Beach Boys are more influential sounds like the "ironic" response. Nirvana is the only thing I could think of that compares to what the Beatles did in my lifetime. Obviously I'm not comparing Nirvana's impact to the Beatles, but as far as music/cultural change in music, it's probably the only thing that comes close.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89480 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 8:18 am to
quote:

I see where they are called the most influential pop/rock group of all-time and yet I have friends who claim The Beach Boys are far more influential.


The massive success of the Beatles in leading the british invasion overshadows their American precursors - you can almost point to the Beach Boys as the "American" Beatles - and, further, the Beach Boys were big, first.

If you think back to the classic rock and roll period - even the early "pre" rock antecedents - you had black blues and R&B artists, some with strong jazz backgrounds, picking up the tempo (and I'm thinking of Fats, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, here, among others), Elvis, Perkins, Bill Haley, Buddy Holly - and even if they were associated with a band (Bill Haley's "Comets" and Holly's "Crickets"), there was this strong "front man" persona. The Beach Boys were a very, very early example of a self-contained band that worked, primarily, on albums and actively moved away from the singles format.

And that became the template for the 1960s and 1970s - self-contained bands that did not have extensive horn sections (although soul, funk and some rock acts of the 70s brought that back, some - EWF and Chicago, notably, had huge footprints) or other baggage like that, and, more importantly, wrote their own songs (many of the early rock acts and pop singing groups performed, primarily, songs written by others).


And your early bands that had success with this organizational structure were the Beach Boys (American) and The Beatles (UK).

But, Brian Wilson, particularly, is one of the most influential musicians of all time. Virtually every band that came after them - and made albums, pointed to Pet Sounds (1966). Hard to argue with that as being quite influential, particularly internationally for the up and coming British Invasion acts.
This post was edited on 5/28/15 at 8:21 am
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
29150 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 8:22 am to
quote:

The Beach Boys, as good as they were, never had an "Eleanor Rigby."



And some of us are thankful for that.
Posted by saint amant steve
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
5695 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Beach Boys>Beatles tho :fact:


The Beach Boys couldn't and still can't hold John or Paul's jock strap.
Posted by saint amant steve
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
5695 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:00 am to
quote:

The Beatles started out playing poppy, bubble-gum rock and roll. About three years later, they recorded "Eleanor Rigby." And that's all one really needs to know about the greatness of the Beatles. The Beach Boys, as good as they were, never had an "Eleanor Rigby."



I was watching the documentary Hotel California, great take on the LA folk and country rock scene of the '60s and '70s, and oddly enough David Crosby chose to single out "Paperback Writer" as his standard for songwriting.

He said something to the effect of how agitated he was by the fact that he would never be able to write a song that good.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
8840 posts
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:08 am to
I like the Beach Boys more than the Beatles, but I can't say the Beach Boys were more influential than the Beatles. Two different categories imo. I don't think the Beach Boys were nearly as consistent, but I don't think the Beatles ever made a song better than Good Vibrations or a better album than Pet Sounds.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram