- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many movie sequels is too much?
Posted on 3/22/13 at 6:01 pm to Napoleon
Posted on 3/22/13 at 6:01 pm to Napoleon
quote:Everyone said this when it came out. I don't agree. I thought the first two were both pretty good. 3 and 4 were trash. 5 was solid but not as good as the first 2. From a pure entertainment standpoint, the second fast and the furious is one of my all-time favorite guilty pleasure movies.
The latest one (Fast Five) was better than the previous 4.
This post was edited on 3/22/13 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 3/22/13 at 6:03 pm to Mad_Mardigan
quote:Walker and Diesel don't have careers outside of these movies so I could see them making 10 or so when it's all said and done.
Just checked. The collective budget for the F&F movies = $409 mill. Worldwide gross = $1,591,404,818.
Posted on 3/22/13 at 6:14 pm to bigeztiger
Fast 5 and 6 have gone away from just being racing movies and more towards being heist films. So yes, there are 6 movies in the series, all interconnected, but the last two have completely different story lines and very little racing scenes.
Posted on 3/22/13 at 6:16 pm to bigeztiger
quote:
How many movie sequels are too many?
FIFY
Posted on 3/22/13 at 6:17 pm to uglycasanova7
bullshite. Die Hard 3 was awesome. It had fricking Samuel L. Jackson. The man has never made a movie that wasn't bad arse. I don't care what anyone says. That was some quality entertainment.
This post was edited on 3/22/13 at 6:18 pm
Popular
Back to top

0






