- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apocalypse Now Movie
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:16 pm to lsudave1
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:16 pm to lsudave1
quote:
how do you think lighting and mise-en-scene help to show bias towards Willard's mission?
I think there was some strategic lighting, but FFC doesn't do a whole lot in this film, beyond making it appropriate for the scene - obviously the final act has LOTS of lighting cues, but that was to help enhance/build tension, rather than establish bias.
Now, mise-en-scene, you have that Willard is clearly "uncomfortable" in civilization- the narration only reinforces that. As they get into combat and, more importantly, the jungle, he gets more and more comfortable - "Never get off the boat" is the back to reality jar, but even then, where Willard keeps his head, clearly has a sixth sense about "another" predator nearby - establishes him as co-equal with the tiger (he even wears so-called "tiger stripe" utilities to distinguish him from the brown river navy folks). (And - he had already gotten "off the boat" and out of their army, again, as the narration reinforces.)
Finally - he completes his mission - what his bosses told him to do - but for the wrong reason. He kills Kurtz to replace him, not to terminate his command as was his higher HQ's intent.
This post was edited on 10/6/17 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:20 pm to lsudave1
quote:
How does this help to paint the picture of him as the protagonist rather than the antagonist when he is clearly neither?
Meh - Willard is clearly the protagonist. The entire film is from his POV. He is the one at a crisis/decision point at the beginning (and several times throughout) and he is the one who has changed/learned something at the end. It is his struggles, internal/external/(hybrid in this film's case) that define the entire film.
I'd have to see a supported argument to reconsider that Willard is clearly the protagonist of this film.
This post was edited on 10/6/17 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:46 pm to lsudave1
quote:
How does this help to paint the picture of him as the protagonist rather than the antagonist when he is clearly neither?
A strong case can be made he is both. How do you think the boys on the PBR would characterize Willard? Chief saw it.
Popular
Back to top


0




