Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:41 am to
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:41 am to
I would think that McLouth would be the starting centerfielder once Chipper gets back, so Schafer is only a shitty temp. Therefore, I do not think that the issue is cf is not as big of a deal with Nate out there. (Although, I am sure Braves fans will crucify me for this).
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:46 am to
I get what you are saying and it is not going to happen, but I honestly believe that if you played out the season with a million simulations with Pence in left and Prado at third and McLouth in center, then you would win more games than the average of the million simulations of Bourn in center and Prado in left and Chipper at third.

That is really all I am saying. Realistically, my thought of this will not come to frutition, but in theory, I truly believe this would result in more wins.
Posted by The White Lobster
Member since Jul 2009
16764 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:46 am to
Nate has been really productive in the 8 hole this year. .426 OBP

I like Nate a lot more than most, but he isn't worth $6.5 million
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:47 am to
quote:

I like Nate a lot more than most, but he isn't worth $6.5 million

Agreed, but he is a hell of a lot of better than Schafer who should being paying to play.

I would have Nate hit eighth also.
Posted by SwampDonks
Member since Mar 2008
18342 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:47 am to
quote:

I would think that McLouth would be the starting centerfielder once Chipper gets back, so Schafer is only a shitty temp. Therefore, I do not think that the issue is cf is not as big of a deal with Nate out there.


That's actually doubtful. Schafer is most likely going to remain in CF. That is until the Braves acquire someone to fill in center which is most certainly going to happen.

Even so, McLouth is terrible at the top of the lineup as well.. There is an issue at CF with Jordan or Nate out there.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:50 am to
If Fredi plays Schafer over McLouth, then that is idiotic.

Also, the centerfielder (unless it is Bourn) should not be hitting leadoff on this team.
Posted by SwampDonks
Member since Mar 2008
18342 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 12:56 am to
quote:

If Fredi plays Schafer over McLouth, then that is idiotic.


Fredi is idiotic.

quote:

Also, the centerfielder (unless it is Bourn) should not be hitting leadoff on this team.


Well obviously it depends on who it is, and you don't want to put someone who isn't going to get on base at the top. But ideally, you want Prado hitting two hole, where his skill set fits perfectly.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:02 am to
I guess we will disagree here, but even though Prado is better suited as a two-hitter, I think he needs to go in the leadoff (if no trades are made) because I love Heyward hitting in the two hole. As you know, Heyward can be a fricking god at getting on-base (ok, yeah he sucks so far this year, but I trust his plate discipline).

Basically, I think that the Braves have two guys who are perfect to hit second, but no one to hit lead off, but Prado is better hit lead off than Heyward.

If no trades are made and the lineup is healthy, then my ideal Braves lineup would be:
Prado
Heyward
McCann
Jones
Uggla
Freeman
Gonzalez
McLouth
This post was edited on 7/18/11 at 1:03 am
Posted by SwampDonks
Member since Mar 2008
18342 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:11 am to
quote:

If no trades are made and the lineup is healthy, then my ideal Braves lineup would be:
Prado
Heyward
McCann
Jones
Uggla
Freeman
Gonzalez
McLouth


I won't disagree with you about Prado needing to hit leadoff if no trades are made. As the team stands, Prado should be at the top just for the fact that the other two options are terrible.

J Hey needs to get his shite together before he is anywhere near the top right now, but ideally, he needs to be there after Prado if no trades are moved. His approach right now is flat out terrible, and he has a bunch of things to work out before he can get things figured out.

I don't believe these starting 8 will be staying the same though. We'll have to see what move is made.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:27 am to
so basically this turned into another ATL thread..

Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
59734 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:34 am to
Really interested in seeing what kind of pitching the Cards get.

We're looking for a Reliever, and a Starter.

Possibly Heath Bell and Jeremy Hellickson(For Rasmus)

Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:37 am to
quote:

I think Adams will be SD's future closer


He's in his 30s and injury prone.

He's getting shipped and the Pads will rob someone.
Posted by SwampDonks
Member since Mar 2008
18342 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:39 am to
quote:

so basically this turned into another ATL thread..


no harm

it's 1:00 in the morning and this thread wasn't really going anywhere
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:41 am to
Nate is so bad on D in CF that it basically saps any of his meager offensive ability. That's why Schafer plays.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:42 am to
quote:

Possibly Heath Bell


gonna have to out-bid the Phillies.

quote:

Jeremy Hellickson(For Rasmus)


what would they do with BJ Upton? they have two really good up and coming young players in LF and RF
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:51 am to
The Rays handling of young players is really puzzling. Hellickson was reportedly ready a year or two ago... but they just kept holding him off.

Appears they are doing the same with Desmond Jennings.

But what I've read is they are more interested in Colby Rasmus than anything... and could do a Upton + Pitcher for Rasmus deal.

I don't think they are in a rush to deal a guy like Hellickson who has superstar potential and is cheap and under control for the next 3 years.
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
59734 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:54 am to
quote:

what would they do with BJ Upton? they have two really good up and coming young players in LF and RF


I think I read Upton's deal is up after this year.

Anyhow, Rasmus was almost traded to Tampa last season, and he has requested a trade too. So I can definitely see them moving him. Maybe to the Tampa, maybe somewhere else. Rockies supposedly have some interest in Rasmus.

Also, Cards supposedly have some interest in the Blue Jay bullpen. That's another possible destination for Colby.
This post was edited on 7/18/11 at 1:55 am
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
46099 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 1:54 am to
quote:

If Fredi plays Schafer over McLouth, then that is idiotic.



I always see people say this, and I just don't understand the reasoning. Nate has a decent OBP this year, but that's only because he has been batting 8th and he gets pitched around frequently. He was batting leadoff for a while last year and his OBP was even worse than Schafer's. Schafer can at least steal bases when he gets on, and Nate isn't a terrible defensive CF, but he is about the least aggressive one I have ever seen.

All in all, both of them are 4th outfielders, but if someone held a gun to my head and told me I had to start one of them in center and let him bat leadoff, I would have to pick Schafer.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 2:17 am to
quote:

I think I read Upton's deal is up after this year.



that would make sense then.

quote:

Anyhow, Rasmus was almost traded to Tampa last season, and he has requested a trade too. So I can definitely see them moving him. Maybe to the Tampa, maybe somewhere else. Rockies supposedly have some interest in Rasmus.

Also, Cards supposedly have some interest in the Blue Jay bullpen. That's another possible destination for Colby.


i know Colby and Tony had some trouble in the past but i'm sure that's water under the bridge now, I just don't understand trading him. especially for a guy like Upton and a bullpen guy. Rasmus has so much upside.

now, if the Rays are dumb enough to include Hellickson in that deal with BJ I say do it. kid has a ton of potential. and Carpenter is getting old.
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
59734 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 2:37 am to
quote:


now, if the Rays are dumb enough to include Hellickson in that deal with BJ I say do it. kid has a ton of potential. and Carpenter is getting old.



Upton would not be in the deal. We would move Jon Jay to CF where he belongs. It would be Rasmus for Hellickson pretty much straight up, aside from maybe a couple minor leaguers.

Rasmus for a starter like Hellickson would be a good trade for both team, The Cards would have a young promising starter, and the Rays would have their future CF for after Upton signs elsewhere after this year. The Rays would control Rasmus until 2015.

And yea, Carp is getting up there, 36 now I believe. He can still pitch though, not his old self, but still good enough to have a .500 or a little better record.

Man, I wish we had Wainwright right now.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram