Started By
Message

re: The Unofficial 2017 Wimbledon Thread

Posted on 7/12/17 at 7:12 pm to
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3400 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

The sport has to be so expensive now with poly going dead quickly and people mixing in nat gut in the hybrids. I bet that's like $30-$40 at my local shop. I like Wilson NXT and Tecnifibre Bi-Phase for feel, but the multis seem to go quickly. When in doubt, back to Prince Syn Gut Duraflex for this guy.


A hybrid job with nat gut is going to have at least $25 worth of string in it and that's the stinger's cost, so heck yeah it does get pretty expensive pretty quick if you're paying someone to do it for you, and that's before markup on string and price of labor. Nothing wrong with Prince SG w/ Duraflex either, especially at around $4 a set!!
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3400 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 8:25 pm to
Actually you might be surprised to find out that there are a good many of top ATP plyers and WTA players that play with Nat Gut mains and poly crosses including three of the big four (Rafa uses full bed RPM Blast) and Serena among others on both tours. But, not as common amongst the younger tour players and really big hitters. I can also tell you that among elite level juniors (at least the boys) hybrid jobs are much less common (whether with natural gut or a synthetic), and Solinco is at least as popular as Luxilon. I will also tell you that the trend is toward lower tension as well - both with touring pros and juniors. Recently strung for three of the top 10 boys 16's in Mid-Atlantic section and all were full bed poly and all 48-52 lbs.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

You're right in general poly wont break but to play with the same strings for years? Come on now Vibe that is just ridiculous.

Eta to answer your question the performance of the strings would go to shite



In my defense, I haven't played tennis since last August.

Part of the problem is that I don't know what "to shite" is supposed to fee like. And if the answer is that "to shite" means "what you feel after the third or fourth time playing with it", then that sucks. I don't like my women or my tennis racquets to be that high maintenance. And tennis racquets can even fellate me.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Natural Gut in a full bed setup is something every serious player should have the pleasure to play with at some point in time. It's as arm friendly as it gets and no slouch on spin, and power to burn. Really requires TLC (especially in the South), but plays perfectly right up untli it breaks.



Why have I never done that? Is the synthetic gut that much cheaper? I honestly do't recall ever giving serious consideration to buying natural gut.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66514 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:40 pm to
At $50 for a string job and having it fray quickly in any humidity, you'll never do it again. I thought it was tough to control unless strung at Borg/Sampras tensions, in which case it becomes even more fragile.
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 9:41 pm
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Recently strung for three of the top 10 boys 16's in Mid-Atlantic section and all were full bed poly and all 48-52 lbs


It wasn't Spencer was it?*


*my buddy's kid is turning out to be very legit at tennis. Free ride to IMG. #1 nationally in 14s; #2 in MATA in 16s, and just lost in the finals of an 18s draw to Stefan Kozlov's little brother. It appears the goal at this point is to become a pro tennis player.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

At $50 for a string job and having it fray quickly in any humidity, you'll never do it again. I thought it was tough to control unless strung at Borg/Sampras tensions, in which case it becomes even more fragile


Before Poly, did pros play with natural gut? Do they break quickly or go to shite quickly? How tight were they stringing them?

Towards the latter stages of HS, when I was playing loads of tennis, I was trending towards going with the syn gut 17, and stringing it at higher tensions (i.e like 67). Not sure how that converts over to natural gut.
Posted by imAMAZING
Member since Sep 2008
6314 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:39 pm to
lets get this thread back to talking about wimbledon...

predictions for women semi
konta > venus 2-1
mugs > rybarikova 2-0

mens semi
federer > berdych 3-0
cilic > querry 3-1
Posted by little billy
Orange County, CA
Member since May 2015
8469 posts
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

redictions for women semi 
konta > venus 2-1 
mugs > rybarikova 2-0 

mens semi 
federer > berdych 3-0 
cilic > querry 3-1


I agree with all your picks and scores.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 12:58 am to
quote:

mens semi
federer > berdych 3-0
cilic > querry 3-


I think Berdy has virtually no chance at beating Fed. I would take Fed at a much much higher price than the market value.

I think that Querrey has some chance of beating Cilic, but a small one that converts to much longer odds than he is currently getting.

So chalk times two.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 1:12 am to
quote:

konta > venus 2-1
mugs > rybarikova 2-0


However, I must humbly dissent on your filly valuation.

The MV crystal ball* showeth Muga, flanked by a lady of African descent -- and with the backdrop of a scoreboard lit up with a 7 over a 5, which is next to a 4 that's under a 6 -- holding top dollar china

*rated at less than 100% reliability
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 7:18 am to
To clarify, Fed is -750 v. Berdy. And, yes, that's a damn steal. Outside of freak injury, i see no chance that Fed loses that match. Like, my mind can gather up it's full imaginative processing powers and still be light years away from dreaming up a scenario where Berdy wins that match. I'd take at twice the current odds, but don't tell that vegas.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66514 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 7:22 am to
Prime Berd could blow anyone off the court at times. And he did beat Roger there in 2010. But, probably not happening this year. That said, when I see top 10 guys getting +750-ish, I tend to sprinkle on the dog. Plus, this is 35 year old Fed we are talking about. Usually, what you lose with age is not peak powers, but consistency.

Mug and Venus are two ladies I can root for. I know nothing about Ryba. Anyone but Kunta.
This post was edited on 7/13/17 at 7:24 am
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 7:48 am to
I wouldn't be so bold if it were 2010 Berd.

But, as it stands, old man Fed of, say, 2012, has morphed into something like we've never even seen before. Roger is essentially unbeatable right now. And Berdy is almost fully washed up. .
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 7:50 am to
Posted by jsk020
Nola
Member since Jan 2013
1761 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 7:54 am to
Muguruza is winning the final
Posted by little billy
Orange County, CA
Member since May 2015
8469 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 7:54 am to
Muguruza is on fire. Just taking it to Rybarikova every point.
Posted by bayoucracka
Member since Sep 2015
6898 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 7:55 am to


I believe this is the correct answer. You can't tell me Roger doesn't lift the trophy more than 75% of the time from this point.
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3400 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Before Before Poly, did pros play with natural gut? Do they break quickly or go to shite quickly? How tight were they stringing them?
, did pros play with natural gut? Do they break quickly or go to shite quickly? How tight were they stringing them?



Yes, Sampras played his whole career with full bed natural gut even after Luxilon (he called it "cheatalon") came out with the first commercially viable polyester monofilament string. He used thinner gauges and generally strung in 70+ lbs range.

Natural gut is more durable that people realize, especially if you take care of it. It also performs better than anything else at higher tensions, and plays just as well the day you put it in until the day it breaks. That being said, it does require care if you want it to last. The stringer's cost is $45-$50 a set for the good stuff (Babolat VS, Wilson or Luxilon - yes Luxilon makes natural gut now) so it is gonna cost you to play with it. If you are a regular customer, your stringer probably won't mark up the price of natural gut string, especially if you know them well.

Also, the stringer definitely matters when it comes to a natural gut job. I believe it should be strung two-piece instead of one, and should be pre-stretched, and one has to be very careful not to kink it at all. I will also say it's a waste in a very stiff, sterile frame like say a Babolat Pure Drive or Pure Aero, Wilson Ultra, Head Instinct, etc. Feels really nice in a more flexible thin beam players frame. Not to mention the fact that in those racquets that have very open string patterns it will also diminish the time it will last.
Posted by nevilletiger79
Monroe
Member since Jan 2009
17570 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 9:18 am to
Nm
This post was edited on 7/13/17 at 9:30 am
Jump to page
Page First 21 22 23 24 25 ... 40
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 23 of 40Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram