- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:30 am to ITdrummer
quote:You do it.
Why don't you give me the avg. home attendance for ulm minus the 'home game' in Little Rock?
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:30 am to Lsuhoohoo
My B. I remember being fairly intoxicated that day, probably why I didn't remember. :)
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:31 am to hendersonshands
So that's Tech's excuse? "We can't outdraw ULM because they play a home game in Little Rock."
Why don't y'all do it then?
Why don't y'all do it then?
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:33 am to xiv
quote:
So that's Tech's excuse? "We can't outdraw ULM because they play a home game in Little Rock."
Why don't y'all do it then?
Because it's f*cking bush league.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:33 am to ITdrummer
quote:Also bush league: being outdrawn by ULM.
Because it's f*cking bush league.
Sorry, Tech. It's the truth.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:34 am to xiv
quote:13,979.
You do it.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:35 am to xiv
quote:
T1, I stand corrected. I apparently misremembered. I do believe that prior to their final decision, they had decided that it would be one of the Texas schools--that's probably why I remembered it that way.
They were at 11 schools and debating if they should add another school for a championship game. They were considering Tech and North Texas primarily. Then they hired a consultant named Chuck Neinas and he went and asked UTEP if they would be interested (because SMU, Rice, and Tulsa had just left the WAC). UTEP thought about it for about a week and decided that it sounded like a good idea. It is uncertain if CUSA would have invited Tech or North Texas to go to 12 if UTEP hadn't shown interest. If they decided to go 12 and UTEP wouldn't have shown late interest, I'm about 90% sure Tech would have been chosen over North Texas.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:36 am to ITdrummer
i'm no la tech fan, but has la tech won a conference championship in any of the 3 major sports in the WAC?
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:37 am to xiv
Did you just accuse me of being a Tech fan?
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:39 am to Enfuego
quote:
i'm no la tech fan, but has la tech won a conference championship in any of the 3 major sports in the WAC?
What's the 3 major? Football, Basketball, Womens Basketball or Baseball?
We've won 1 football championship and a few Women's BB championships. No baseball or men's bb championships.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:40 am to xiv
quote:
Group One:
(Denver)
Idaho
New Mexico State
San José State
Texas-San Antonio
Texas State
Utah State
Group Two:
(Arkansas-Little Rock)
Arkansas State
Florida Atlantic
Florida International
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisiana Monroe
Middle Tennessee State
North Texas
South Alabama
Troy
Western Kentucky
ULL is about to own that conference.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:42 am to Enfuego
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/8/11 at 9:42 am
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:44 am to thebhamdawgfan
Someone is a Coach Hud fan
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:48 am to hendersonshands
Anyway, I'm done with the ulm/ull/Tech pissing match.
Back on topic:
It's obvious and undeniable that the current/new WAC will be a shite-pile. I don't want to go to the Sunbelt, but if we don't get that CUSA bid we need, anyone who says staying in the WAC will be better is a moron.
Back on topic:
It's obvious and undeniable that the current/new WAC will be a shite-pile. I don't want to go to the Sunbelt, but if we don't get that CUSA bid we need, anyone who says staying in the WAC will be better is a moron.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:50 am to Enfuego
nm
This post was edited on 4/8/11 at 9:54 am
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:50 am to Enfuego
As far as the level of competition, the WAC is fine for Tech. They've won a football title in their decade there, and their all-time WAC record is 37-35.
As far as attendance goes, they belong in the Sun Belt (way to get 2/3 of your stadium full for Boise State, boys!).
As far as attendance goes, they belong in the Sun Belt (way to get 2/3 of your stadium full for Boise State, boys!).
Posted on 4/8/11 at 9:53 am to ITdrummer
quote:This is a good stance for any Tech fan to take until Tech can find a way to outdraw ULM.
Anyway, I'm done with the ulm/ull/Tech pissing match.
quote:An obvious truth, which is precisely why more than half Tech's fan base does not believe it.
Back on topic:
It's obvious and undeniable that the current/new WAC will be a shite-pile. I don't want to go to the Sunbelt, but if we don't get that CUSA bid we need, anyone who says staying in the WAC will be better is a moron.
There are a lot of people on the LTBBB who think that going indy is the best idea.
This post was edited on 4/8/11 at 9:55 am
Posted on 4/8/11 at 10:00 am to xiv
quote:
They've won a football title in their decade there
Which is more than Fresno State and as many as Hawaii and Nevada have won. Boise usually goes undefeated and wins it, obviously.
Posted on 4/8/11 at 10:05 am to T1
quote:Tech got 22,000 for the Boise State game last year. Just imagine how many more are gonna show up for the Lamar game!
Which is more than Fresno State and as many as Hawaii and Nevada have won. Boise usually goes undefeated and wins it, obviously.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News