re: TDBL discussion

quote:

---

it would invalidate their offensive and pitching stats for that week.

---

Even if you take a pitcher out that had a save and put another one in?

They would still have a valid lineup, just not the save.

quote:

---

why do you all of the sudden want to go back and re-address? you agreed to let it go. its not like you are getting screwed again.

---

I agreed to let it go because you had said there was no way to fix it. Bottom line. I shrugged it off and choose to not worry about it if there was nothing that could be done.

But there now seems to be a way to fix it. Why not fix it?

You are acting like I am the one that fricked up. No. I followed the rules, and in turn got penalized.

I have a feeling that most people would want to change a mistake if they had the chance.

If you see it as whining, thats fine. Your opinion matters little. Im just having a conversation to get to the bottom of this. You don't have to take part or read it.

well I really had nothing to do with the 1st case. I swear to the Holy Lord.


But it has opened my eyes that it looks like I can get the points i was entitled too from Week 1.

Ryan doesn't seem to want to work with me. He is being pretty close minded here. Maybe I should contact one of the asst commish's of the league.

quote:

---

, then how is the innings pitched minimum even going to be enforced?

---

by just trusting people

As a former co-commish if you contacted me I was simply ask you to STFU

quote:

---

As a former co-commish if you contacted me I was simply ask you to STFU

---

quote:

---

I agreed to let it go because you had said there was no way to fix it. Bottom line. I shrugged it off and choose to not worry about it if there was nothing that could be done.

But there now seems to be a way to fix it. Why not fix it?

---

there isn't.

quote:

---

You are acting like I am the one that fricked up. No. I followed the rules, and in turn got penalized.

---

you didn't get penalized. you were given a couple extra wins because something shady happened. it was discovered and is now being corrected.

I have a feeling that most people would want to change a mistake if they had the chance.[/quote]

i agree. just like we are correcting the mistake of giving you extra wins.


if there was any way i could go back and give you the wins when your opponent pitched extra innings, i would do it, but as explained, its not possible. at the time of this happening i proposed a few ideas. one that made a ton of sense to me was to allow you to control your opponents pitching when you played him next time around. you decided it wasnt a big deal.

Ironically no shannigans went on when i was co-commish which is more than I can say about the post BFHC commish days

quote:

---

My question is, if Ryan can't change the record so that LE and geaux gets points, then how is the innings pitched minimum even going to be enforced?

---

1.4. Each team must pitch a minimum of 25 IP or have at least 5 starts. Teams must also pitch a minimum of 900 IP per year.

Any team that does not meet the weekly inning requirements will forfeit control of their roster for the scoring period after the infraction is reported. Any team that does not meet the annual inning requirements will forfeit their spot in the playoffs (if eligible). The next person in line will then take their place.

Anyone intentionally ignoring these rules is subject to having their team suspended or possibly kicked out of the league.

On special occasions such as the All-Star break, these rules will be temporarily modified. 2 weeks prior to any rule being changed, the commissioner will notify the league. That rule will stay changed during the "special" period ends. If at least 75% of the league has an issue with the temporary rule change it will not be changed in the first place.