Started By
Message

re: TDBBL Week 12 Preview

Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:06 am to
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:06 am to
Who is on your block again?
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:09 am to
J Rich
Kenyon Martin
Delonte West
Brook Lopez
Marc Gasol
Drew Gooden
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:39 am to
Just made you an offer for upgrade in draft pick
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:55 am to
I have to be explaining my trade position poorly, or no one pays attention.
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:59 am to
I am offereing you an upgraded pick for a guy you arent keeping...if you dont want to do it thats cool.
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:02 am to
The difference between Beasely / Bosh and VC/Jamison is much smaller than the difference between Bellinelli, Daniels, Hill, Kleiza for Miller, Deng, Hinrich, Ilgauskas.

Its that simple.
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:15 am to
You are right Nobes, I'm sorry. It was just a shitty offer considering I already got offered a 3rd for him. I didn't mean to suggest your trade was out of line.
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:18 am to
If I had a 3 i would have offered a 3.

I sure as hell am not offering a 2 though.

Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:38 am to
what was the trade?
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:43 am to
how does this help you?
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:44 am to
Man, I would argue VC and Jamison are > Bosh and Beasely


Dont get me started on

Belleneli
Kleiza
Hill
Daniels

vs.

Miller
Ilgauskas
Deng
Heinrich


Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:45 am to
Rick thinks, as contenders, we are just scared Les is getting good.

I literally look at it more from the perspective of, it royally fucsk rick.
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:47 am to
quote:

You are totally discounting that this is a KEEPER LEAGUE BROTHER.


Just because he he is POSSIBLY giving you better long term players doens mean you need to take all of his waiver wire fodder and give him every player you have that is worth a shite.

You didnt even get any picks for fricks sake.
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:50 am to
Rick FWIW i'm on your side in a sense that you feel you are upgrading your keepers. I understand what people are saying in sense that the rest of the deal is pretty lopsided. I wouldn't veto b/c I don't think vetoes were put in place for people to judge your trading skills. I think you could get a better deal and personally I don't even think your overall keeper situation is better in this deal, but it's not grounds for veto b/c you aren't cheating.
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:55 am to
It's a simple as the other contenders worried about losing ground, simple as that
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 10:56 am
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:57 am to
quote:

personally I don't even think your overall keeper situation is better in this deal


same here
Posted by NOBODY
Member since May 2007
48772 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:00 am to
Rick, effectively what you are saying is:

If a team improves your keeper situation, then EVERY OTHER PLAYER OF ANY VALUE is theirs too, just to say thanks.


That shite dont fly.


Kleiza, Belleneli, and Daniels will all be on waivers as when Jackson, Dunleavy, and Melo are all playing.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:00 am to
quote:

So you vetoed on your opinion on whether Vc/jamison is going to be better than beasley/bosh next year?


frick yeah, i didn't even veto ron's trade. at least i saw where you would be better next year in that deal. Unless you think Vince and Jamison are going to fall off after this year (which I don't) then I don't see how you think you got better.
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:07 am to
I'd rather just do away with it and let RMCC void obvious collusion.
Posted by TigerPhan27
edgy racial f'n pervert.
Member since Apr 2008
15693 posts
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:09 am to
Here's another problem, if this deal goes through and Ronnie's deal got nixed, now Ronnie is the one getting screwed in the deal
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 55
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 55Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram