- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDBBL Week 12 Preview
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:06 am to TigerPhan27
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:06 am to TigerPhan27
Who is on your block again?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:09 am to NOBODY
J Rich
Kenyon Martin
Delonte West
Brook Lopez
Marc Gasol
Drew Gooden
Kenyon Martin
Delonte West
Brook Lopez
Marc Gasol
Drew Gooden
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:39 am to TigerPhan27
Just made you an offer for upgrade in draft pick
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:55 am to NOBODY
I have to be explaining my trade position poorly, or no one pays attention.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 9:59 am to TigerPhan27
I am offereing you an upgraded pick for a guy you arent keeping...if you dont want to do it thats cool.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:02 am to rmc
The difference between Beasely / Bosh and VC/Jamison is much smaller than the difference between Bellinelli, Daniels, Hill, Kleiza for Miller, Deng, Hinrich, Ilgauskas.
Its that simple.
Its that simple.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:15 am to NOBODY
You are right Nobes, I'm sorry. It was just a shitty offer considering I already got offered a 3rd for him. I didn't mean to suggest your trade was out of line.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:18 am to TigerPhan27
If I had a 3 i would have offered a 3.
I sure as hell am not offering a 2 though.
I sure as hell am not offering a 2 though.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:44 am to PortCityTiger24
Man, I would argue VC and Jamison are > Bosh and Beasely
Dont get me started on
Belleneli
Kleiza
Hill
Daniels
vs.
Miller
Ilgauskas
Deng
Heinrich
Dont get me started on
Belleneli
Kleiza
Hill
Daniels
vs.
Miller
Ilgauskas
Deng
Heinrich
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:45 am to PortCityTiger24
Rick thinks, as contenders, we are just scared Les is getting good.
I literally look at it more from the perspective of, it royally fucsk rick.
I literally look at it more from the perspective of, it royally fucsk rick.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:47 am to rmc
quote:
You are totally discounting that this is a KEEPER LEAGUE BROTHER.
Just because he he is POSSIBLY giving you better long term players doens mean you need to take all of his waiver wire fodder and give him every player you have that is worth a shite.
You didnt even get any picks for fricks sake.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:50 am to rmc
Rick FWIW i'm on your side in a sense that you feel you are upgrading your keepers. I understand what people are saying in sense that the rest of the deal is pretty lopsided. I wouldn't veto b/c I don't think vetoes were put in place for people to judge your trading skills. I think you could get a better deal and personally I don't even think your overall keeper situation is better in this deal, but it's not grounds for veto b/c you aren't cheating.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:55 am to rmc
It's a simple as the other contenders worried about losing ground, simple as that
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 10:56 am
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:57 am to TigerPhan27
quote:
personally I don't even think your overall keeper situation is better in this deal
same here
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:00 am to rmc
Rick, effectively what you are saying is:
If a team improves your keeper situation, then EVERY OTHER PLAYER OF ANY VALUE is theirs too, just to say thanks.
That shite dont fly.
Kleiza, Belleneli, and Daniels will all be on waivers as when Jackson, Dunleavy, and Melo are all playing.
If a team improves your keeper situation, then EVERY OTHER PLAYER OF ANY VALUE is theirs too, just to say thanks.
That shite dont fly.
Kleiza, Belleneli, and Daniels will all be on waivers as when Jackson, Dunleavy, and Melo are all playing.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:00 am to rmc
quote:
So you vetoed on your opinion on whether Vc/jamison is going to be better than beasley/bosh next year?
frick yeah, i didn't even veto ron's trade. at least i saw where you would be better next year in that deal. Unless you think Vince and Jamison are going to fall off after this year (which I don't) then I don't see how you think you got better.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:07 am to rmc
I'd rather just do away with it and let RMCC void obvious collusion.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 11:09 am to TigerPhan27
Here's another problem, if this deal goes through and Ronnie's deal got nixed, now Ronnie is the one getting screwed in the deal
Popular
Back to top


1



