Started By
Message

re: Jack vs Tiger

Posted on 4/5/25 at 5:51 am to
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
18575 posts
Posted on 4/5/25 at 5:51 am to
quote:

The different equipment each had has nothing to do with comparison. Both players peers had the same clubs as them.


Jack stuck with his endorsement equipment even though it was inferior for the time.

I saw an article where a Titleist rep thought Jack would have won even more IF he had made some equipment changes.

Maybe that’s just Titleist hype, I’ll try to link article
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
17491 posts
Posted on 4/5/25 at 6:18 am to
quote:

There were people pointing out way back when Tiger was in his prime that his swing was a ticking time bomb as it pertained to his body. They were (correctly) pointing out that it was a matter of when, not if, his body was going to pay the price for the torque of his swing. Yet, Eldrick did nothing about it. So, was his game really "better" when everyone knew the inevitable result?


This is dumb. Tiger's long term injuries arent caused by his golf swing.

He did a bunch of hardcore training and then the car accident(s). Nobody could look at his golf swing and predict that.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram