- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Best Franchise in the NFC South?
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:10 pm to TigerBait2008
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:10 pm to TigerBait2008
quote:
So this is based because of what you saw for one week?
Be a douche if y'all would like, I'm actually a Saints fan, and yes, I've been to their compound before, as well as Tampa Bay's...
However, this makes me wonder, would the people who have been to all four of the organizations be the only people that are capable of answering this question?
3
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:12 pm to Cecil D Diesel
quote:
Cecil D Diesel
I responded to you on the coaching changes board about pioli.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:16 pm to Cecil D Diesel
quote:
However, this makes me wonder, would the people who have been to all four of the organizations be the only people that are capable of answering this question?
Possibly. Depends what they mean by best franchise. Best ran franchise, best football team, best front office, team that makes the most money? Best franchise can mean a lot of things.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:17 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
As much as I love my Bucs, not a snowball's chance in hell as long as the Glazers are running things.
The Glazers are infinitely better than the Culverhouses. During the Culverhouse era, the Bucs were one of the cheapest (and most profitable) teams in the NFL. The Bucs turnaround in the late 90s can be mostly attributed to the change of ownership. The problem with the Glazers these days is that they're more preoccupied with that other team across the Atlantic.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:19 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
I gotcha
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:24 pm to F machine
Yeah, I completely understand that. It's all based on an individual's interpretation of what "best" means.
I was more so wondering what the two or so posters who responded to my original post in this thread thought, being as though they jumped to conclusions on my experiences and thoughts on the issue.
I was more so wondering what the two or so posters who responded to my original post in this thread thought, being as though they jumped to conclusions on my experiences and thoughts on the issue.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:42 pm to Cecil D Diesel
quote:
would the people who have been to all four of the organizations be the only people that are capable of answering this question?
Seems like common sense to me..
Posted on 1/14/13 at 3:48 pm to Indfanfromcol
quote:
Not the saints, seeing how they are the most losing team in the history of football.
Not the falcons, since they have never won a superbowl.
Not the panthers, since they just plain out suck besides that 1 superbowl win.
My vote goes to Tampa. Trying to be as unbiased as possible.
Lowest All-time Winning Percentage for Regular Season, current franchises, .395
Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 1976–present
Lowest All-time Winning Percentage, combined Regular Season and Post Season, .395
Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 1976–present
Longest Losing Streak, Multiple seasons, 26 games
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 1976–1977
Most consecutive losing seasons, 14 seasons
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 1983–1996
You were saying?
quote:
seeing how they are the most losing team in the history of football
Oh really??
Comparing Related National Football League Franchises based on All-time Losses
Detroit Lions 593
Philadelphia Eagles 541
Green Bay Packers 524
New York Giants 524
New Orleans Saints 383
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 3:54 pm
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News