- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/1/09 at 5:02 pm to msutiger
quote:
JJ cant get us to the national championship is what I'm saying unless wthe O-Line gets going. Mauck was not that good but he was smart
Well, if you're basing whether JJ is a success on whether he wins the NC this year, you've set him a pretty high hurdle. I think all of the last 10 (and probably more) National Champions had a Junior or Senior as QB. Not all of them had a lot of starting experience but they were all upperclassmen. I don't think we have any of those on the shelf right now. And, no, I don't think a red shirt sophomore counts.
Posted on 10/2/09 at 3:12 am to msutiger
quote:
Terms: JJ must pass for 220 JJ cant have more than 2 Delay of games (2 is an even split) Losers: 1) Losers must wear avatar provided by msutiger or zachenke 2) Can post on the rant for 3 days
Ok.....2 things.
1. The 220 yds thing isnt necessarily dictated by JJ alone. He may not get there because we possibly may have the running game up and running. If we are running the football at will and eating up clock then the passing game takes a back seat. JJ has no control over play calling.
2. JJ could have more rushing yards. The Oline is so terrible that he has to scramble/run more than just drop back and pass.
I'll come back later on to keep the negotiations alive.
Posted on 10/2/09 at 7:23 am to msutiger
(He has not impressed me)
You need a

You need a
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:28 am to Sammobile
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/14/23 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:32 am to msutiger
quote:
yes, but i am a bit nervous now
Why would you be nervous about the LSU starting QB performing well?
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:36 am to msutiger
quote:
But if you want to join you can.
naw maybe next bet, i'll leave this one to you two
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:39 am to DanceCommander
quote:
Why would you be nervous about the LSU starting QB performing well?
betting wise I am. I hope I lose the bet though, I want JJ to prove me wrong. Just because im not a fan of the QB doesnt mean Im not an LSU fan.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:46 am to msutiger
Do you even enjoy watching the games or do you just curse the QB the whole time?

Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:46 am to msutiger
quote:
Pick your side no bitches who wont consent to obeying the rules if they lose
what a cluster frick.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:49 am to DanceCommander
quote:
Do you even enjoy watching the games or do you just curse the QB the whole time?
I did curse alot lat week but it was directed mostly towards the long snapper
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:53 am to msutiger
quote:
I did curse alot lat week but it was directed mostly towards the long snapper
My frustration mostly lies with the playcalling of our RB's being sent up the middle into 8 oncoming defensive guys.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 9:55 am to DanceCommander
quote:
My frustration mostly lies with the playcalling of our RB's being sent up the middle into 8 oncoming defensive guys.
Thats where JJ and the O-Line come in. If he can become a major threat to pass it, they wont load the box which opens up the running game
Posted on 10/3/09 at 10:00 am to msutiger
quote:
Thats where JJ and the O-Line come in. If he can become a major threat to pass it, they wont load the box which opens up the running game
The ability and talent is there, we have all seen it come together in Atlanta. That's what is frustrating about watching this offense. We all KNOW it can be better.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 10:00 am to DanceCommander
Hopefully it comes together and clicks today. UGA has a bad defense and if we cant get it together today, I will be very very worried
Posted on 10/3/09 at 10:22 am to msutiger
quote:
if we cant get it together today, I will be very very worried
They are still a talented SEC team. Anything could happen.
I've given this team a pass the last couple of weeks. Now is the time to come to play. If they can't get "up" for this one after what happened last year, I don't know what else to say.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 10:54 am to msutiger
quote:
Terms: JJ must pass for 220 JJ cant have more than 2 Delay of games (2 is an even split) Losers: 1) Losers must wear avatar provided by msutiger or zachenke 2) Can post on the rant for 3 days Pick your side no bitches who wont consent to obeying the rules if they lose msutiger: msutiger zachenke: zachenke
Again JJ's passing numbers arent dictated only by him. They may call more run plays than passing plays.
Same goes for the delay of games. There have been times when Crowton didnt get the play in in time and they dont want to waste time outs. Its not always on JJ.
My proposed terms:
Passing yards 200yds, 2td.....If less than 200 he must have 3 tds to make up for it. so:
200+ yds and 2tds or 199yds or lower and 3tds.
3 Delay of games(Only if its not a result of them looking to the sidelines.)
Fair??? I will do as you ask if you win. If I win, you have to post a pic of you wearing JJ's jersey in your avatar the rest of the season.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 12:40 pm to amarti9
Why don't you guys use "fantasy" points? Award/Subtract points for yards (rushing and passing), TD's, INT's Delays of game, etc...
Then set a minimum point number.
Then set a minimum point number.
This post was edited on 10/3/09 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 10/3/09 at 12:41 pm to msutiger
Glad this stayed up - I'm okay with the terms
ETA: i actually really like amarti's terms - oh, and you might want to edit the original so it says "can't" post instead of "can"
ETA: i actually really like amarti's terms - oh, and you might want to edit the original so it says "can't" post instead of "can"
This post was edited on 10/3/09 at 12:46 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






