Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Topic I posted last year about QB ratings

Posted on 12/8/19 at 10:58 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162217 posts
Posted on 12/8/19 at 10:58 pm
Keep in mind that this post was on 09-24-2018 (and yes I was wrong about some of the things in that thread.) Anyway, the premise was at the time LSU was a pretty odd statistical anomaly among top rated teams and there seems to be an extreme correlation between top rated teams and passer rating.

LINK /

quote:

Top 7 teams from AP with team pass rating in parenthesis
1. Alabama(1)
2. Georgia(5)
3. Clemson(21) * - ongoing QB shuffle that seems to probably be resolved now
4. Ohio State(3)
5. LSU(107)
6. Oklahoma(4)
7. Stanford(23)

I stopped at 7 because I think after that there is a pretty big drop off as far as teams that have a serious chance to contend for a conference title (outside of ND who recently made a change at QB and is independent)

ETA: Also of note West Virginia is #12 with a 3-0 record and has a passer rating of #2 overall

ETA Again - This would mean that the teams that are ranked 1-5 in passer rating are all undefeated and currently in the top 12. I don't know if I've seen this correlation so closely related to on field success before.



So it seems like we've crossed the brink here that success in college football is almost 100% related to passing.

Here are the highest rated passers in college football in 2019:

quote:

1 - Tua Tagovailoa - ALA
2 - Joe Burrow - LSU
3 - Jalen Hurts - OU
4 - Justin Fields - OSU
5 - Tyler Huntley - UTAH
6 - Tanner Morgan - MINN
7 - Trevor Lawrence - CLEM

I simply went just as far down as needed to capture all teams in the CFP

But you'll notice those other teams had pretty high levels of success as well.

I was wrong about a few other things in the original thread last year but I do think that passing efficiency is probably the strongest current correlation to elite success.

I suppose to further review this topic I could look at pass efficiency defense to have some reflexive view. I want to say that OU, Clemson, and UGA were pretty high on that list.
This post was edited on 12/8/19 at 10:58 pm
Posted by eauxshiiiii
Member since Sep 2018
218 posts
Posted on 12/8/19 at 11:05 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/8/19 at 11:30 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162217 posts
Posted on 12/8/19 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

(No message)

Damn I was hoping someone would actually respond
Posted by LSUShock
Kansas
Member since Jun 2014
4915 posts
Posted on 12/8/19 at 11:52 pm to
Returning starters, especially upperclassman and on defense, is also a big indicator of success for CFB. Something like 85% of teams who return a QB and more than 10 starters have a better record than the year before. LSU is in that category this year.
Posted by Terrific Tales
Member since Jan 2019
19425 posts
Posted on 12/8/19 at 11:53 pm to
Sorry, all I got out of this was this:

How the frickity frick is Tua rated higher than Burrow?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162217 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 12:02 am to
quote:

How the frickity frick is Tua rated higher than Burrow?



Fewer INTs
Posted by Terrific Tales
Member since Jan 2019
19425 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 12:04 am to
Fair enough.

Fewer wins too
Posted by millerf43
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2019
457 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 12:57 am to
quote:

success in college football is almost 100% related to passing.


That statement is "true enough."

Very oversimplified answer is: passing plays are no longer "low percentage" plays. This is contrary to the truisms of field position and good down and distance wins football games. What may have been true about the game 10 to 15 years ago doesn't necessarily hold in 2019.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram