- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: To those so upset about the rematch...
Posted on 12/5/11 at 1:28 am to Rekrul
Posted on 12/5/11 at 1:28 am to Rekrul
quote:
Bama lost by 3 to the number one team in OT this year. Can you honestly say that Bama isn't one of the best 2 teams in the country? Really explain that because I'd love to hear your argument.
What I don't get is that everyone keeps saying the BCS job is to put the 2 best teams together but we didn't need them to...the regular season did it. And LSU won, by 3, in OT. Bama lost their chance. If there were no other contenders, then it's understandable to give Bama another shot. But another 1 loss conference champ? Somebody got screwed.
0
Posted on 12/5/11 at 1:37 am to TK421
Michigan was the undisputed second best team in 2006, according to the vaunted eyeball test.
OK looked real good in 2003. Miami passed the eyeball test in 2002 and surely couldn't lose to a plodding Ohio state team that had a close shave every week.
If we can tell what teams are better just by looking at them, how come the pundits don't pick every game right?
This was so ridiculous
OK looked real good in 2003. Miami passed the eyeball test in 2002 and surely couldn't lose to a plodding Ohio state team that had a close shave every week.
If we can tell what teams are better just by looking at them, how come the pundits don't pick every game right?
This was so ridiculous
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News