- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The two best team argument BCSCG
Posted on 1/8/13 at 4:46 pm to MoreOrLes
Posted on 1/8/13 at 4:46 pm to MoreOrLes
The two best team argument BCSCG
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Besides Ala, A&M, S.C., GA, Fla & LSU would have beat ND. And that is what is wrong with 2 best team scenario. ND was at best the 8th or 9th best team in the country.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Besides Ala, A&M, S.C., GA, Fla & LSU would have beat ND. And that is what is wrong with 2 best team scenario. ND was at best the 8th or 9th best team in the country.
Posted on 1/8/13 at 4:50 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
Exactly. Further more anyone who makes the argument that the BCS is just as good at picking a champion is a fool.
Champions are picked on the field.
Every school no matter whom they are or how much they pay their coaches deserves a shot.
Further, to accept this BCS product is insulting. Each teams season is over when they cannot make the MNC.......even of that occurs in the middle of the season. By that type of reasoning LSU should not have attended the chicken bowl at all.
Sorry folks all MNC's are illegitimate and do not prove whom the best team is until there is an 8 team playoff. That's just a fact
Using your logic then wouldn't it need to be a 119 team playoff? Everyone deserves a shot right?
Popular
Back to top

0




