Started By
Message

re: So lost 2 “commitments” in less than a week

Posted on 12/3/20 at 8:31 pm to
Posted by BigTimer23
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2015
2015 posts
Posted on 12/3/20 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

OK, both are true. Your point??


His point is no one has a problem when the program does it, only the players. And it’s actually a good point.

It’s also mind blowing how many people think these kids made this decision. Go read or listen to the recruiting guys. None of this is surprising, quite the opposite actually. These kids got processed. It’s an unfortunate reality of the recruiting game.
This post was edited on 12/3/20 at 8:34 pm
Posted by kwtiger70
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
858 posts
Posted on 12/3/20 at 8:45 pm to
You have to prioritize needs as numbers get tight. LSU has a need at O Line and defensive back so someone has to go to make room. As with the opt outs, it’s a business decision.
Posted by Ragin Tiger1
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2018
1064 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:18 am to
Wrong board
Posted by Tiger79
Zachary
Member since Apr 2009
7519 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:32 am to
It's called "processing". We need a few more Olinemen, and have to save spots for Leigh, Mason, and Foreman.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
41578 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:13 am to
quote:

if everyone is going to say Marshall quit on the team


OK, and there is a known reason for that. But...

quote:

it is fair to say LSU quit on these two recruit.


What is it for this?
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
44032 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:26 am to
quote:

That’s why I put no stock in recruiting ranking until the LOI is signed.

How many more do we lose and does the class completely fall apart?


A: Wrong Board
B: Are you new to recruiting?
C: It's called processing
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
31285 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 12:40 pm to
O likes to process long time commits but it always seems to backfire.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
137887 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 2:15 pm to
You think we “lost” two recruits?

Lulz.
Posted by des4271
Member since Oct 2014
4327 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 6:40 pm to
Those 2 were the least desirable of the commitments and therefore they were most likely told they wouldn’t have a scholarship for them because they were holding those 2 for lot better players who will sign in the late signing period,
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram