- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:13 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
Someone explain because I'm ignorant on the subject.
quote:
READ AND REACT FLAT OUT SUCKS.
WE MUST GET A DC
These answers are so in-depth.
quote:
LSU under Lou Tepper
These answers are so in-depth.
quote:
"YOU WANT ANSWERS. YOU WANT THE TRUTH. YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH."
These answers are so in-depth.
That's what I love about the Rant. Everyone will criticize, but when it comes down to answering questions about the actual game being played, no one knows what the frick they're talking about.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:13 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
We arent coaches. It is easier to see the problem than the solution.
If you're not a coach, how do you know what you're looking at?
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:17 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Arnsparger ran a bend but don't break defense in the 80's. Had success but I don't think he would be nearly as successful today with the same players running it simply because the offenses are much more complex and would eat it alive.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:18 pm to Mmorsey
quote:
Play the conerback's 10 plus yards off the receiver so they can throw short passes all frickin day long. To play a soft zone so the defense can always have the play develop in front of them but yet we still end up with our safeties in one on one situations.
not really
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:29 pm to ATLTiger
quote:
not really
yes really
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:29 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
That's what I love about the Rant. Everyone will criticize, but when it comes down to answering questions about the actual game being played, no one knows what the frick they're talking about.
That's the point that I was trying to make.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:31 pm to Mmorsey
quote:
yes really
I would venture to say that we're running man coverage in the secondary at least 2/3 of the time.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:32 pm to Colonel Hapablap
and half the time we run man to man we are bringing a 4 man rush
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:34 pm to Mmorsey
what does that have to do with whether or not we are running a soft zone? If we're not running a zone at all, then we're clearly not running a soft zone either.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:35 pm to Colonel Hapablap
quote:
If you're not a coach, how do you know what you're looking at?
By looking at the scoreboard.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:36 pm to kclsufan
quote:
By looking at the scoreboard.
another excellent Rant answer.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:36 pm to Colonel Hapablap
well a soft man to man
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:39 pm to Mmorsey
quote:
another excellent Rant answer.
Yes it is.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 5:44 pm to Mmorsey
All i was doing was trying to explain the basic fundamentals of the read and react defense and you take part of my post and criticize it. I didnt say every play is a soft zone but its the philosophy of playing a cushion and keeping the plays in front of you and then reacting to them
Popular
Back to top


1





