- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: rant myths
Posted on 12/16/09 at 12:40 pm to BooHoo Tbow
Posted on 12/16/09 at 12:40 pm to BooHoo Tbow
bfniii made his mark around here by arguing that the LSU gameplan and playcalling vs Auburn in 2006 was perfect and we only lost because the refs are meanies.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 12:43 pm to Roaad
quote:
2006 (Jimbo & Searles' last year)
Total Offense: 11
Passing: 18
Rushing: 31
Sacks allowed: 24 (19)
2007
Total Offense: 26
Passing: 58
Rushing: 11
Sacks allowed: 66 (30)
2008
Total Offense: 55
Passing: 71
Rushing: 43
Sacks allowed: 45 (22)
2009
Total Offense: 108
Passing: 99
Rushing: 84
Sacks allowed: 107 (35)
definitely not giving crowton a pass (i want him gone) but could the fact that we had a first overall draft pick under center in 06 and a fifth year senior in 07 have a little something to do with the trend compared to what we've had since?
Posted on 12/16/09 at 12:46 pm to bfniii
quote:
as i said, if there isn't significant improvement next season, then i'm ok with letting crowton go. but i see the big picture. it's not just letting someone go. there has to be a viable replacement and those don't just grow on trees despite what college kids today think. the timing has to be right and that is something i trust miles with. regardless of what you think about crowton's stats this year, the offense was good enough to keep lsu in the elite of the sec. period.
Wait....wait...if there's not significant improvement next year, you're going to allow Miles to stay??? You're going to allow Miles to say, "hey, obviously another guy I hired is performing so poorly that I have to let him go. It's not me as a head coach, you understand, it's these morons I keep hiring as assistants."
Since you're willing to let go of Crowton next year, when we're ranked 118th (that's about what the trend predicts) -- you'll agree that some people could reasonably say, no he should go this year rather than taking the chance that he might not suddenly reverse that trend because we don't want to see LSU go 5-7 next year with a completely inept offense. That's fair, right?
The offense was good enough to what?
Dude, this team was much closer to being 6-6 than it was to winning one more game this year? You don't think we could have lost to Georgia, Arkansas or MSU???
This offense wasn't good enough for 9-3. We were lucky. Please understand that.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 12:50 pm to TDTGodfather
quote:
but could the fact that we had a first overall draft pick under center in 06 and a fifth year senior in 07 have a little something to do with the trend compared to what we've had since?
I'll say it again...
quote:
Crowton has had to start a FR or SO for the majority of the season 6 times. 3x at BYU, 2x at LSU and 1x at La Tech. 2x the offenses were terrible (03, 09) 3x the offenses were average (02, 04, 08) and 1x the offense was great (97).
In the 7 years where Crowton has been able to start a JR or a SR the offenses have always been great. (95, 96, 98, 01, 05, 06, 07).
You can even say that his 1st year with the Bears he was able to start Shane Matthews and Jim Miller and they had the 3rd ranked passing offense. In his second year he was forced to start Cade Mcnown and the offense was bad.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 12:50 pm to Reality Tiger
quote:
You don't think we could have lost to Georgia, Arkansas or MSU???
but we didnt
quote:
This offense wasn't good enough for 9-3.
but it did
Posted on 12/16/09 at 1:29 pm to bfniii
Everyone know more than LSU coaches......
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:huge is relative. in terms of starters, the gap isn't nearly as big as rantards make it out to be. it narrows even more when you're talking about teams in the same 3rd of the conference.
there is a HUGE gap b/w florida and vandy or MSU
quote:again, there's probably some info you're not aware of. regardless of what you think about it and even if crowton doesn't work out at lsu, that doesn't mean the hire wasn't solid.
les, a coach with a shaky history in hiring coaches, hired him after this failure
quote:the point still stands. from all indications, mich wants miles. wanted him in '07 too.
that's why lloyd car led a revolution against miles last time, b/c he's so well-respected by UM?
quote:basically that you don't think the offense should ever have had any hiccups because of the "talent gap" pipe dream. do you honestly believe that's realistic? did meyer's offense take a hit this year without harvin?
where does a requirement of 0 mistakes get born out of discussing an offense ranked in the 100s (out of 120 teams)?
quote:if you can't tell the difference between '08 and '09, then you need to reevaluate your football knowledge
same arguments for 2008
quote:better than you will ever give it credit
it wasn't that great this year
quote:this doesn't respond to my point. and as i said, if the o improves, the criticisms of crowton will be falsified
or we just are mad that les fricked up another coaching hire
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:23 pm to Number 3 is my Hero
quote:first, what do you base the "talent gap" on? rivals and scout? the draft? football awards? those are all very subjective and often flawed. second, even if they were right, then explain how saban lost to utah. explain how meyer lost to ole miss last season. the talent gap should have prevented that.
Where are the numbers?
quote:it's common sense. well, at least for some people.
So far I have only seen opinions and rebuttals of opinions, no actual facts or numbers.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:24 pm to Maximus
max, that response coming from you means my points are right on target
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:26 pm to Maximus
quote:i never said it was perfect. but it certainly didn't deserve the criticism rantards were giving it.
bfniii made his mark around here by arguing that the LSU gameplan and playcalling vs Auburn in 2006 was perfect and we only lost because the refs are meanies.
and seriously, if you don't think that was the worst officiated game of all time, then you've got some serious mental issues
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:27 pm to bfniii
quote:
bfniii
Exactly you are using your opinion, you are dismissing rivals, scouts, or anything else and basing your "facts" on what you believe.
total fail
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:37 pm to bfniii
quote:
i never said it was perfect. but it certainly didn't deserve the criticism rantards were giving it.
sitting on a 3 point lead running horrible running backs for 2 yards a pop when you have a first round QB and 3 top WRs was beyond horrible and classic Les Miles conservative garbage.
quote:
nd seriously, if you don't think that was the worst officiated game of all time, then you've got some serious mental issues
and seriously, if you don't think that blaming all of Miles' shitty games on the refs is chickenshit than you are well you are bfniiii
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:40 pm to Maximus
quote:
Maximus
Come on Max, I mean just look above he discusses the FACTS as he calls them but he really just means his opinion.
He can produce no facts about anything, he just type what he thinks and attempt to dismiss and deflect what anyone else thinks.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:44 pm to bfniii
quote:= biggest LSU homer, Miles worshiper, program crusader on the internet today. Do you EVER have any constructive criticism of the program? Cause if you don't, this is why all your arguments fall flat.
bfniii
You remind me of the big boobed, blond cheerleader on the sidelines yelling "two bits", when we are down by 24 points in the 4th quarter.
This post was edited on 12/16/09 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:50 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
LSUBEATLES is worse in my opinion
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:57 pm to bfniii
quote:The goal is not to "shove him out", most reasonable people realize that Miles isn't going anywhere at least until next year. The goal is to light a fricking fire under his arse to do a better job than he has the last two year, to let him and the administration know in no uncertain terms that the fans are restless and unhappy and deserve and want better, and to fricking act like you care when you are out there coaching instead of appearing to be a disinterested, clueless observer on the sidelines.
the problem is that rantards don't understand you don't just shove someone out without A VERY GOOD REPLACEMENT. those people are often locked up in contracts
This is one of the few forums that will allow for that kind of discourse and the LSU brass needs to hear it loud and clear.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 2:58 pm to Number 3 is my Hero
quote:He's part of the circle jerk brigade with bfiniii, Lonnie, and Tator.
LSUBEATLES is worse in my opinion
Posted on 12/16/09 at 3:05 pm to Reality Tiger
quote:
represents the university adequately.
quote:
Have you ever heard the guy talk??? He makes Bush look like Obama.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 3:31 pm to bfniii
quote:
and seriously, if you don't think that was the worst officiated game of all time, then you've got some serious mental issues
My God, you actually said something that I agree with. Of course, it followed a ridiculous backpedaling (a common theme you have) of your belief that the 2006 Auburn playcalling/game plan wasn't that bed. I guess it was OK when we were down 4 points with less than 20 seconds left, with no timeouts on the 18 yard line, to line up in a formation with a Fullback and Tight End on the field and WR Buster Davis (future 1st round draft pick) on the bench. Only you, Les, I mean Bfnii could think that's OK.
Posted on 12/16/09 at 4:34 pm to Reality Tiger
quote:i was referring to crowton, not miles. sorry about the confusion
if there's not significant improvement next year, you're going to allow Miles to stay?
quote:this is exactly the kind of unreasonable response i outlined in the op. we are 9-3 and luck is no more a factor than any of the others i listed
This offense wasn't good enough for 9-3. We were lucky.
Popular
Back to top


1


