Started By
Message

re: Noob ?

Posted on 7/15/10 at 1:12 am to
Posted by SouthernMan
Charlotte
Member since Nov 2008
1380 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 1:12 am to
quote:

it still makes my point (I never said Chavis was better, just comparable) that Chavis is one of the best in the business

But, if you just include Saban's numbers from LSU and Bama and then Chavis' numbers from UT(since 1995) and the past year from LSU which would be the most fair, and the math I've done is correct, then the numbers favor Saban.


So less than a field goal average over a 15 year career draws you to the conclusion that Chavis is crap?

I NEVER made the case that one was BETTER than the other, just that they had COMPARABLE scoring defenses. Anyway you slice it that stands and you look pretty petty for trying to tear the man down by selecting the better numbers from Saban's career to make your point. (and still you failed)

Bottom line, Saban's gone and we are fine. Chavis is one of the best in business and our defense will be as good as anyone over the next few years.

Let's hope our Oline and QB play get's to where it needs to be and we'll be right back on top!
Posted by Rocket
Member since Mar 2004
61117 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 1:29 am to
quote:

So less than a field goal average over a 15 year career draws you to the conclusion that Chavis is crap?


Where did I ever suggest Chavis is crap? What is wrong with you? You think I'm arguing something I'm not. Saying the those revised numbers favor Saban doesn't mean I'm arguing Chavis is crap. You're overly sensitive.

quote:

I NEVER made the case that one was BETTER than the other, just that they had COMPARABLE scoring defenses


That's true, especially if you include Saban's stints at MSU, which is in the Big 10.

quote:

Anyway you slice it that stands and you look pretty petty for trying to tear the man down by selecting the better numbers from Saban's career to make your point. (and still you failed)


I'm not trying to tear anyone down. You appear to be under the impression that I'm somehow not a fan of John Chavis and that's not true. When you post up these numbers and say you got them from a website I've never been to before tonight, I'm not just going to not make an effort to see if your numbers are correct.
quote:

(and still you failed)


I really wasn't trying to make a point. All I was saying is that if you just count the numbers from the conference they've both competed in, when that's the most fair way to do it, the numbers favor Saban. For some reason, you are upset about that.

quote:

Bottom line, Saban's gone and we are fine.


Saban is gone but we have major question marks going into this season on both sides of the ball.

quote:

Chavis is one of the best in business and our defense will be as good as anyone over the next few years.


As good as anyone? It certainly wasn't as good as Bama's this past year. I hope it is but there is no guarantee we'll have the premier defense in the league.

quote:

Let's hope our Oline and QB play get's to where it needs to be and we'll be right back on top!


I hope so but we're not guaranteed any success. I have strong concerns about several positions. My concerns are more about personnel than coaching.


Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18876 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 2:04 am to
I don't know who anchored your original shitty thread. But I banned you for calling out another poster and staring a new thread n response to an existing one -- twice -- despite my asking to you to stop dong it.

Both are prohibited under the Guidelines.

Your affection for your Uncle Chavis is admirable. But clearly you care too much about winning an Internet argument.
Posted by THECookieMonster
Member since Feb 2010
48 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 4:50 am to
You're acting like a big vagina right now...
Posted by SouthernMan
Charlotte
Member since Nov 2008
1380 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 5:00 am to
quote:

I don't know who anchored your original shitty thread. But I banned you for calling out another poster and staring a new thread n response to an existing one -- twice -- [quote]despite my asking to you to stop dong it.


Thanks for joining in. Now, I'm sure I'll get banned for this but you are lying through your teeth to say that you asked me to stop doing something and I did it twice.

First, Rocket called me out and called me a liar and several other vulgar names. (If I remember correctly, you did as well)

I defended my position and yes, I started one thread to issue the challenge.

I then received a warning at the top of my profile and the VERY next time I tried to post, just a few minutes later I was banned.

Whoever the admin was that communicated with me yesterday had been given the impression that I was banned for spamming bleacheReport (which I had not done) and seemed puzzled as to why I was banned.

Having admin rights does not make you right. Just because you lose an argument doesn't give you the right to ban someone, that is WEAK SAUSE and Chicken should pull your privileges.
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18876 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Now, I'm sure I'll get banned for this but you are lying through your teeth to say that you asked me to stop doing something and I did it twice.
Let's go to the videotape:
quote:

Challenge for Rocket!! (Posted on 4/17/10 at 7:32 p.m.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this thread LINK Rocket (aka Wagon) called me a liar and told me to go pleasure myself about fifteen times.
Deleted for "calling someone out" and starting a new thread in response to an existing thread. See Guidelines/FAQ.
quote:

Challenge For Rocket (Posted on 4/17/10 at 7:37 p.m.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this thread LINK Rocket (aka Wagon) called me a liar and told me to go pleasure myself about fifteen times.
Deleted for "calling someone out" and starting a new thread in response to an existing thread, despite being asked not to do it again.
quote:

Just because you lose an argument doesn't give you the right to ban someone, that is WEAK SAUSE and Chicken should pull your privileges.
I'm not arguing with you. I'm telling you exactly what happened. Feel free to file your complaint with the board owners.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Ft. Lauderdale
Member since Jul 2005
33264 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 10:49 am to
quote:

The Third
Worst 13th post EVER.
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34400 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 11:53 am to
bump for the attn whore
Posted by SouthernMan
Charlotte
Member since Nov 2008
1380 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 4:21 pm to
quote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge for Rocket!! (Posted on 4/17/10 at 7:32 p.m.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this thread LINK Rocket (aka Wagon) called me a liar and told me to go pleasure myself about fifteen times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deleted for "calling someone out" and starting a new thread in response to an existing thread. See Guidelines/FAQ.
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge For Rocket (Posted on 4/17/10 at 7:37 p.m.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this thread LINK Rocket (aka Wagon) called me a liar and told me to go pleasure myself about fifteen times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deleted for "calling someone out" and starting a new thread in response to an existing thread, despite being asked not to do it again.


So you are saying that I purposefully started the EXACT same thread inside of five minutes and received a warning in between that time which was violated?

Really, so when some posters have the same post pop up back to back two and three times you think they are using repetition for emphasis?

Come on man, be better than that.

You banned me because something I typed pissed you off, it's as simple as that.

If you and the Board Owners are cool with that then knock yourself out but we both know it is punk.
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18876 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

You banned me because something I typed pissed you off, it's as simple as that.
I don't have any dog in this hunt. I literally could not care less how Chavis and Saban compare as defensive coaches. It's irrelevant.

You violated two board rules twice. Not my issue if you can't comprehend.
Posted by SouthernMan
Charlotte
Member since Nov 2008
1380 posts
Posted on 7/15/10 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

You violated two board rules twice. Not my issue if you can't comprehend.


That is simply not the case.

If my post duplicated, as has happened to me and many other posters a million times then I can't really help that but I was not 'told not to do something' repeatedly nor did you give me a chance to even comprehend what was happening.

You just banned me and then left me banned for four months for a duplication; really?

If you don't have a dog in the hunt then why didn't you ban Rocket last night for calling me out in a separate thread to answer the original thread?

It's supposedly what you banned me for?

Bottom line, it was a punk move and we both know it. You don't want to say my bad, no problem but don't try to take the high road, you are not on it.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram