- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/3/16 at 5:32 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
Your act has grown stale, Slackster. You are slacking. Get a new schtick.
Can't even ask questions around here apparently. You all are awfully sensitive today.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 5:47 pm to Poodlebrain
That was the beauty of it. There wasn't a player package tied to the play calls. The play was called and the fresh guys were in there. Finally taking advantage of how fricking deep we are.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:07 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
I actually care about this again.
Feels good doesn't it, I was close to giving up on 'em, Thank You O
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:18 pm to slackster
quote:
Didn't hear this, thanks for sharing!
All I asked was the background for the question. I expected there had to be something more than a different WR3 getting playing time, but if Ensminger said that then I understand the source of the question.
Glad I could help clear that up. Sorry for the negative comment on my part. I'll remove it.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:28 pm to slackster
quote:
What sparked this question? I didn't see any major changes in personnel Saturday.
After I read this quote I knew it would be you. Looked up to see who posted and yep...slackster. follow miles to his next stop. If you didn't see personal changes you didn't even watch the game.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 7:24 pm to tiogatiger19
quote:
After I read this quote I knew it would be you. Looked up to see who posted and yep...slackster. follow miles to his next stop. If you didn't see personal changes you didn't even watch the game.
They rotated WRs more often. That isn't exactly a premise for the question to be asked the way it was. As you'll note, someone cleared it up later in the thread that Ensminger or Orgeron made a comment about leaving the personnel decisions up to the position coaches.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 8:07 pm to slackster
quote:
slackster
So should we fire Coach O because we didn't win by 60???? I got a better idea to make you feel better. We should just bring Miles back... Would that cure your stupidity????
Posted on 10/3/16 at 8:11 pm to dukke v
quote:
So should we fire Coach O because we didn't win by 60???? I got a better idea to make you feel better. We should just bring Miles back... Would that cure your stupidity????
PJ, what the frick are you talking about?
This thread took a weird turn from page one. Someone posted a comment about the personnel changes and the previous regime. I didn't understand the basis for the comment considering all I recalled form the game Saturday was more rotation at WR. I personally don't view that as a major personnel decision, but whatever. Since then people have been flipping out as if it was some sort of support for Miles. You all have lost your damn mind.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 8:13 pm to slackster
quote:
You all have lost your damn mind.
Should they have fired Miles or not???
Posted on 10/3/16 at 8:16 pm to dukke v
quote:
Should they have fired Miles or not???
Hell yes.
This thread has been a disaster. I asked a question that wasn't answered until page 4 and people took it to be some sort of pro-Miles statement. Idk what the hell happened in here.
ETA: This was posted by D500MAG a page ago:
quote:
This question came from Ensminger saying he left the personnel decisions up to the position coaches, that it was their job and he trusted them to do it.
I hadn't heard that comment, hence I didn't understand where the question on page 1 originated.
This post was edited on 10/3/16 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 10/3/16 at 8:19 pm to slackster
quote:
This thread has been a disaster. I asked a question that wasn't answered until page 4 and people took it to be some sort of pro-Miles statement. Idk what the hell happened in here.
Well I have seen A ton of your posts since MIles was fired and you seemed rather sad... AND After the game Saturday it seems you are reluctant to give proper credit where it is due....
Posted on 10/3/16 at 8:28 pm to dukke v
quote:
Well I have seen A ton of your posts since MIles was fired and you seemed rather sad
I've defended him form unnecessary criticism about his entire time here. Haven't once suggested he needed to stay anymore.
quote:
After the game Saturday it seems you are reluctant to give proper credit where it is due....
I believe the most important part of the game plan Saturday was the energy - more important than play calling and all of that stuff. The coaches and players have said since then that they weren't calling new plays out there, they just changed their approach to when those plays should be called. That was my point Saturday night. There weren't wholesale changes and there weren't going to be wholesale changes. Tinkering with what you call and when you call it helped, but that was the same offense we've seen for a few years except it was repackaged with a nice little bow on top.
None of that should be taken as "pro-Miles" though, by any stretch. I believe I even stated how bad it was for Miles because the team was basically the same but his staleness and reluctancy to tinker with even the most minute things were obviously holding them back.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 11:33 pm to BeeFense5
Beefense...With miles gone......doubling down on stupid!!!
This post was edited on 10/3/16 at 11:34 pm
Posted on 10/3/16 at 11:37 pm to slackster
This was more than just a bow on the offense. Sure we ran play X with miles and against Missouri. But that doesn't make them the same. One coaching staff called plays so that the defense knew what was coming. Another coach called it so the defense didn't always know what was coming. Despite what Miles thinks that does make a big difference.
Ex. notice the two jet sweeps followed immediately by two fake jet sweeps. Just one example of many.
Ex. notice the two jet sweeps followed immediately by two fake jet sweeps. Just one example of many.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 11:38 pm to Jwho77
Wow...we fired the $4.5 million guy....and got rid of stupid....all at the same time!!!
Posted on 10/3/16 at 11:48 pm to omegaman66
quote:
One coaching staff called plays so that the defense knew what was coming. Another coach called it so the defense didn't always know what was coming.
I didn't mean to insinuate otherwise. We took the same offense and repackaged it. Changing the sequence and breaking tendencies is part of the repackaging, but the plays themselves are what they are.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 11:49 pm to slackster
You just keep digging....20,000+ posts set your personality in stone
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:00 am to jcc4009
quote:
You just keep digging....20,000+ posts set your personality in stone
One guy responded with the context that explained the basis for the question. I thanked him and that was that. Everyone else tried to make it something it wasn't.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News