re: Lee/Jefferson combo is better than the singular of either

Posted by musick

the internet

Member since Dec 2008

26125 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:25 am to TigerWoody

If perilloux doesn't come in periodically then we dont winning SEC and we all know what that means.

JJ is now essentially RP 2.0

This post was edited on 10/5/11 at 10:26 am

3 ...

Posted by TigerWoody

btwn where I was & where I will be

Member since Dec 2007

11387 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:26 am to musick

quote:
If perilloux doesn't come in periodically then won't dont winning SEC and we all know what that means.

JJ is now essentially RP 2.0

however, this won't go well.

Posted by CantonTiger128

Member since Aug 2011

1291 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:27 am to CharlesLSU

perhaps you should check the post above for the non 100 yard passing games from a year ago, and perhaps you should look at our scoring offense from the past two years. If you are trying to say he suddenly got better over the Summer, okay, I can't say whether he did or didn't....but please don't tell me to look at that pitiful performance the past two years overall with numerous three and outs, turnovers, poor red zone efficiency, and scoring 2 td's a game less.......

3 ...

Posted by ScoopAndScore

baton rouge

Member since Oct 2008

11960 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:27 am to dustytiger123

quote:
Lee/Jefferson combo is better than the singular of either

Of course having depth is always better than not having depth. Look at Florida right now. A true freshman is your backup QB?? How does that happen at Florida?

Posted by CantonTiger128

Member since Aug 2011

1291 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:29 am to drexyl

How often did RP actually play? Seriously? I think (hope I'm wrong) that JJ will be playing much more than him and it will be an actual dual qb role....which sucks.

Posted by CharlesLSU

Member since Jan 2007

31908 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:30 am to CantonTiger128

quote:
If you are trying to say he suddenly got better over the Summer, okay, I can't say whether he did or didn't....but please don't tell me to look at that pitiful performance the past two years overall with numerous three and outs, turnovers, poor red zone efficiency, and scoring 2 td's a game less.......

so, you admittedly don't know if he's better or not (sure as hell won't listen to expert opinions), but feel free to pass judgment from play that is 2 years old. Good thing you aren't a coach.

ETA: and to spice it up a bit (means make yourself look dumber), you dismiss EVERYTHING good the kid accomplished (i.e. Bama, aTm, etc.). Dude, take a fricking walk.

This post was edited on 10/5/11 at 10:32 am

Posted by CantonTiger128

Member since Aug 2011

1291 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:30 am to TigerWoody

nope...i think it is actually good around the goal line or in very short yardage situations...other than that...yes, i do.

Posted by Boh

Baton Rouge

Member since Oct 2009

12357 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:32 am to CantonTiger128

2009 RZ passing efficiency
Jefferson was 10th in the country in RZ efficiency. 11 touchdowns, 1 interception.

Of course, that was 2 years ago and he definitely regressed last season.

But at least we know he's capable of being good in the RZ. Let's hope he is a force on the field when he gets into the games and performs well.

This post was edited on 10/5/11 at 10:33 am

Posted by CantonTiger128

Member since Aug 2011

1291 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:33 am to CharlesLSU

play that is less than 1 year old yes......and play that i have seen for 2 years yes....

however, I am not even a huge JL supporter. What really identifies an idiot is one that wants "to make a change just to see" when something is working the best it has in years. That's like saying, I hired this new CEO to manage our company and our output has immediately improved...but just to see if I'm right, I am contemplating going back to the the old CEO who was responsible for poor output...makes a lot of sense doesn't it??? lmao

Posted by TigerWoody

btwn where I was & where I will be

Member since Dec 2007

11387 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:33 am to CantonTiger128

quote:
nope...i think it is actually good around the goal line or in very short yardage situations...other than that...yes, i do.

So, if the offense bogs down and can't seem to get it going, how many consecutive "nothing" possessions should Les allow to occur before he puts a different QB in for a change of pace?

Posted by TIGERMAD

new orleans

Member since Aug 2011

55 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:35 am to dustytiger123

for this week, all I care about is ---- let's get off the 90th offensive ranking in the NCAA for goodness sake-

Whatever works to produce offensive points and rack up more yards and have less 3 downs and out -- lets do it.

I would like to see us below a ranking of 30 by seasons end.

3 ...

Posted by CantonTiger128

Member since Aug 2011

1291 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:37 am to Boh

quote:
Of course, that was 2 years ago and he definitely regressed last season.

But at least we know he's capable of being good in the RZ. Let's hope he is a force on the field when he gets into the games and performs well.

So he regressed bigtime last year, and we currently have someone leading a redzone attack that is near the top, and when you look at TD's compared to fg, they are nearly #1.......so you want to experiment to SEE if he can actually deliever the numbers we are already getting.....makes sense...lol

Posted by TigerWoody

btwn where I was & where I will be

Member since Dec 2007

11387 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:38 am to TIGERMAD

quote:
Whatever works to produce offensive points and rack up more yards and have less 3 downs and out -- lets do it.

Agree.

quote:
I would like to see us below a ranking of 30 by seasons end

I don't give one drizzly shite where we rank offensively, so long as we get to the SECCG and the BCSNC.

Posted by TheEye

Rightcha.

Member since Dec 2006

4737 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:39 am to TIGERMAD

[quote]
for this week, all I care about is ---- let's get off the 90th offensive ranking in the NCAA for goodness sake-

With our "D" our overall ranking will never be great. We play a ball controlled "O" and usually have good field position. Scoring Offense is more important, and we look a lot better in that category.

This post was edited on 10/5/11 at 10:46 am

Posted by CantonTiger128

Member since Aug 2011

1291 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:42 am to TigerWoody

I dunno...we haven't seen that this year through 5 games....althought we certainly saw it often last year until he FINALLY made a change...

Posted by CantonTiger128

Member since Aug 2011

1291 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:46 am to TIGERMAD

quote:
for this week, all I care about is ---- let's get off the 90th offensive ranking in the NCAA for goodness sake-

Obviously we are dealing with a college kid here who has absolutely no clue about what is going on offensively. LSU is scoring 38 points per game and is in the top 20 in the nation in scoring with a balanced offense averaging over 350 yards a game.....who cares about fricing total yards if the offense is performing at that level scoring 38 a game....good god.

Posted by just me

Front of the Class: Schooling You

Member since Mar 2006

34489 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:46 am to CantonTiger128

quote:
So he regressed bigtime last year

He had a horrible October.

However, he bounced back brilliantly in November and the bowl game.

Posted by TigerWoody

btwn where I was & where I will be

Member since Dec 2007

11387 posts

Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:47 am to CantonTiger128

quote:
we certainly saw it often last year

...and we are getting to the heart of the schedule, the part in which it seemed to be at its worst last year. I am hoping it doesn't happen again, however, I think the team is better prepared to deal with it immediately in the event it does.