Started By
Message

re: Lack Of Hill After Fumble

Posted on 10/21/13 at 12:03 pm to
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84335 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

we moved the ball well the entire first half. 3 ints killed our drives, nothing to do with running the ball.



Even though Hilliard and the other backs ran the ball well, they just don't have that homerun ability that Hill has. Yes, the interceptions are the main reason we lost the game, but holy shite you don't keep a RB on the bench when he averages over 9 yards a freaking carry on the ground.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 12:03 pm to
Well Hill would have gotten a lot more carries if we don't turn the ball 3 times in the first half, go down 17 points, and then be incapable of stopping Ole Miss anytime we scored.
Posted by Football_Freak
Member since May 2012
2410 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 12:05 pm to
Hilliard is good. Hill is a game changer. Miles's cost us the game with his principle demonstration. Idiot.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram