Started By
Message

re: For those who claim that Chavis can't defend the spread....

Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:30 pm to
i had the numbers for every defense that they each coached several weeks ago. every single defense that pelini has been the primary coordinator for, even his year at nebraska, is better than any year chavis has had in his entire career. if you look at their numbers it's pretty damn obvious that pelini is a better DC.
This post was edited on 12/29/08 at 2:31 pm
Posted by GeauxWarrior12
Hammond
Member since Jan 2007
2804 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

he's a clear downgrade from pelini


Very untrue.

Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Very untrue.



go look at both of their career numbers and get back to me
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83111 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

go look at both of their career numbers and get back to me


Guess it doesnt matter, Pelini left.
Posted by GeauxWarrior12
Hammond
Member since Jan 2007
2804 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

go look at both of their career numbers and get back to me


I personally think Bo is better, but to say Chavis is a clear downgrade is discounting what he's done. The man is a very good coach.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:41 pm to
it really doesn't matter. chavis could be a great hire if some of the rumors about his assistants are true, but i think the quality of the hire is dependent upon that. the only reason for mentioning pelini is that he was widely considered as not good enough for LSU, which is humorous to me now that someone who runs a similar defense only not as effectively is coming in and he's a "great hire". i guess expectations have been lowered since the saban to pelini transition
This post was edited on 12/29/08 at 2:42 pm
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83111 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

the only reason for mentioning pelini is that he was widely considered as not good enough for LSU, which is humorous to me now that someone who runs a similar defense only not as effectively is coming in and he's a "great hire". i guess expectations have been lowered since the saban to pelini transition


Oh, I understand. LSU fans only tired of Pelini when his 2007 defense sputtered late in the year (due to injuries IMO). Otherwise, Pelini's defenses were great at LSU and I hope Chavis can duplicate them.
Posted by GeauxWarrior12
Hammond
Member since Jan 2007
2804 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

the only reason for mentioning pelini is that he was widely considered as not good enough for LSU, which is humorous to me


I agree with that, but you have to realize the people your dealing with here. They think only God and Saban are good enough for LSU.
Posted by djack13
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2005
393 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:46 pm to
Well not every since this year it wasn't. Also, it is not an apples to apples comparison. Chavis has been playing against elite competition for 15 yrs (Spurrier with Whuerfell, Ike Hilliard, Jacquez Green, Riedel Anthony ring a bell?).

-The complaint you had against Chavis was exactly what got Pelini in trouble against UK & Ark last year. Did you watch the Kentucky game? Did you watch how we continued to just rush 4? That's scheme my friend.

Pelini has only been a true DC twice. Nebraska and here. Let's be honest Bob Stoops has a lot to do with the OU defense. Also, let's remember that OU got 55 rung up on them against SC in '04. The year Pelini was co-dc, if you would like to take credit for that.

So is only true stops were Nebraska in '03 & LSU '05-'07

Chavis is definitely on par with Pelini. You can't compare 15 yrs with 4.

Both have NCs & in Chavis' NC game he held the likes of Travis Minor, Peter Warrick to 16 pts.

Posted by jacquespene8
Nashville, TN
Member since Sep 2007
4397 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:46 pm to
and honestly Chavis will be dealing with a lot more talent than what he's had at UT.
Posted by xenythx
Member since Dec 2007
33245 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:49 pm to
First, let me say that I think Chavis is a good hire for you guys.

However, those stats of Tennessee against Florida are misleading. Urban was still running his ultra-conservative version of his offense (which also contributed to the loss to Ole Miss the following week). Brandon James and the Gator defense gave them a short field all day and the only thing that stopped the Gators from putting up more yards on Tennessee was the endzone. Demps and Rainey also hadn't emerged that early in the season yet.

That's nothing against Chavis and his ability to stop the spread, just that noone has been able to slow the Gator's offense this season. Save maybe Miami early in the season (go figure).
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83111 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

and honestly Chavis will be dealing with a lot more talent than what he's had at UT.



Doubt the difference is that much.
Posted by jacquespene8
Nashville, TN
Member since Sep 2007
4397 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Doubt the difference is that much.


thanks
Posted by CP3JR25
Louisiana
Member since May 2008
815 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:54 pm to
9 out of 14 years he has been defense cord. they were top 3 in the sec
Posted by djack13
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2005
393 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 2:58 pm to
Tenn. still have great individual players but their depth is what has really hurt them.

For example,

Berry & Mayo

The days of Will Overstreet & John Hendersons have been long gone. So yes, the talent level is way different.

Also, that's fine if you claim FLA hadn't hit their stride yet. But that is no reason to discount the effort either. That being said, Saban is the best defensive coach in the country and he couldn't stop it. Therefore, my point is that you aren't going to find a lot better than Chavis with his experience. There is a reason he was offered by multiple programs to take the DC job. And the programs weren't New Mexico or NWST.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83111 posts
Posted on 12/29/08 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Tenn. still have great individual players but their depth is what has really hurt them.


You're probably right. I had read somewhere that TN had more defensive NFL players than LSU, so I figured the talent couldnt be very different. Probably for most of his career there, Chavis had elite players plus depth.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram